HD Graphics 400 vs Radeon RX Vega 5

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX Vega 5 and HD Graphics 400, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX Vega 5
2020
15 Watt
4.45
+308%

RX Vega 5 outperforms HD Graphics 400 by a whopping 308% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking6591087
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency21.2513.01
ArchitectureVega (2017−2020)Generation 8.0 (2014−2015)
GPU code nameVegaBraswell GT1
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date7 January 2020 (5 years ago)1 April 2015 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32096
Core clock speedno data320 MHz
Boost clock speed1400 MHz600 MHz
Number of transistorsno data189 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt6 Watt
Texture fill rateno data7.200
Floating-point processing powerno data0.1152 TFLOPS
ROPsno data2
TMUsno data12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataRing Bus

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataDDR3L
Maximum RAM amountno data8 GB
Memory bus widthno dataSystem Shared
Memory clock speedno dataSystem Shared
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 (11_1)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.3
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX Vega 5 4.45
+308%
HD Graphics 400 1.09

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RX Vega 5 2438
+442%
HD Graphics 400 450

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD19
+375%
4−5
−375%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 7
+600%
1−2
−600%
Cyberpunk 2077 9
+350%
2−3
−350%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
+367%
3−4
−367%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+333%
3−4
−333%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%
Forza Horizon 4 21
+320%
5−6
−320%
Forza Horizon 5 12
+500%
2−3
−500%
Metro Exodus 10−12
+450%
2−3
−450%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18
+350%
4−5
−350%
Valorant 18
+350%
4−5
−350%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
+367%
3−4
−367%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+333%
3−4
−333%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%
Dota 2 21
+320%
5−6
−320%
Far Cry 5 21
+320%
5−6
−320%
Fortnite 27−30
+350%
6−7
−350%
Forza Horizon 4 17
+325%
4−5
−325%
Forza Horizon 5 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Grand Theft Auto V 13
+333%
3−4
−333%
Metro Exodus 10−12
+450%
2−3
−450%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 41
+310%
10−11
−310%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+400%
3−4
−400%
Valorant 12−14
+500%
2−3
−500%
World of Tanks 50
+317%
12−14
−317%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
+367%
3−4
−367%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+333%
3−4
−333%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%
Dota 2 37
+311%
9−10
−311%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+360%
5−6
−360%
Forza Horizon 4 14
+367%
3−4
−367%
Forza Horizon 5 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+344%
9−10
−344%
Valorant 12−14
+500%
2−3
−500%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 4−5 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 4−5 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+343%
7−8
−343%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4 0−1
World of Tanks 30−35
+313%
8−9
−313%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Forza Horizon 5 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Metro Exodus 3−4 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Valorant 12−14
+333%
3−4
−333%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 16−18
+325%
4−5
−325%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+433%
3−4
−433%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+333%
3−4
−333%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+433%
3−4
−433%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Dota 2 16−18
+325%
4−5
−325%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Fortnite 4−5 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 4−5 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 2−3 0−1
Valorant 4−5 0−1

This is how RX Vega 5 and HD Graphics 400 compete in popular games:

  • RX Vega 5 is 375% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.45 1.09
Recency 7 January 2020 1 April 2015
Chip lithography 7 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 6 Watt

RX Vega 5 has a 308.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

HD Graphics 400, on the other hand, has 150% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX Vega 5 is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 400 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 5
Radeon RX Vega 5
Intel HD Graphics 400
HD Graphics 400

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 218 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 5 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 419 votes

Rate HD Graphics 400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.