GeForce4 4200 Go vs Radeon RX Vega 5
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon RX Vega 5 and GeForce4 4200 Go, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
RX Vega 5 outperforms GeForce4 4200 Go by a whopping 42500% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 722 | 1590 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 21.87 | no data |
| Architecture | Vega (2017−2020) | no data |
| GPU code name | Vega | NV28M |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 7 January 2020 (6 years ago) | 15 November 2002 (23 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 320 | 6 |
| Core clock speed | no data | 2 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1400 MHz | 200 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 150 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | no data | medium sized |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | no data | DDR |
| Maximum RAM amount | no data | 128 MB |
| Memory bus width | no data | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | no data | 200 MHz |
| Shared memory | - | - |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12_1 | DDR |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 19 | -0−1 |
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Counter-Strike 2 | 43 | 0−1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 9 | 0−1 |
| Resident Evil 4 Remake | 11 | 0−1 |
Full HD
Medium
| Battlefield 5 | 22 | 0−1 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 29 | 0−1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| Far Cry 5 | 15 | 0−1 |
| Fortnite | 52 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 20−22
+900%
|
2−3
−900%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 17 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 16−18
+183%
|
6−7
−183%
|
| Valorant | 55−60
+148%
|
21−24
−148%
|
Full HD
High
| Battlefield 5 | 18 | 0−1 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 7 | 0−1 |
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 50
+456%
|
9−10
−456%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| Dota 2 | 39
+457%
|
7−8
−457%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 12 | 0−1 |
| Fortnite | 21 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 20−22
+900%
|
2−3
−900%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 15 | 0−1 |
| Grand Theft Auto V | 13 | 0−1 |
| Metro Exodus | 4 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 16−18
+183%
|
6−7
−183%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 14
+250%
|
4−5
−250%
|
| Valorant | 55−60
+148%
|
21−24
−148%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 16 | 0−1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| Dota 2 | 37
+429%
|
7−8
−429%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 20−22
+900%
|
2−3
−900%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 16−18
+183%
|
6−7
−183%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 9
+125%
|
4−5
−125%
|
| Valorant | 55−60
+148%
|
21−24
−148%
|
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 12 | 0−1 |
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 9−10
+350%
|
2−3
−350%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 30−35 | 0−1 |
| Grand Theft Auto V | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| Metro Exodus | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 30−35 | 0−1 |
| Valorant | 45−50 | 0−1 |
1440p
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| Far Cry 5 | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 6−7
+500%
|
1−2
−500%
|
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 8−9 | 0−1 |
4K
High
| Grand Theft Auto V | 16−18
+14.3%
|
14−16
−14.3%
|
| Valorant | 21−24 | 0−1 |
4K
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| Dota 2 | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| Far Cry 5 | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 5−6
+400%
|
1−2
−400%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 5−6
+400%
|
1−2
−400%
|
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RX Vega 5 is 900% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- Without exception, RX Vega 5 surpassed GeForce4 4200 Go in all 19 of our tests.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 4.26 | 0.01 |
| Recency | 7 January 2020 | 15 November 2002 |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 150 nm |
RX Vega 5 has a 42500% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 17 years, and a 2043% more advanced lithography process.
The Radeon RX Vega 5 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce4 4200 Go in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
