GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition vs Radeon RX Vega 5
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon RX Vega 5 and GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
GTX 780M Mac Edition outperforms RX Vega 5 by a considerable 44% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in the ranking | 650 | 562 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Power efficiency | 21.52 | 3.82 |
Architecture | Vega (2017−2020) | Kepler (2012−2018) |
GPU code name | Vega | GK104 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Release date | 7 January 2020 (4 years ago) | 8 November 2013 (11 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 320 | 1536 |
Core clock speed | no data | 771 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1400 MHz | 797 MHz |
Number of transistors | no data | 3,540 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 28 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 122 Watt |
Texture fill rate | no data | 102.0 |
Floating-point processing power | no data | 2.448 TFLOPS |
ROPs | no data | 32 |
TMUs | no data | 128 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
Interface | no data | MXM-B (3.0) |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | no data | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | no data | 4 GB |
Memory bus width | no data | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | no data | 1250 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | no data | 160.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | no data | No outputs |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 12_1 | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | no data | 5.1 |
OpenGL | no data | 4.6 |
OpenCL | no data | 1.2 |
Vulkan | - | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | - | 3.0 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
Full HD | 18
−33.3%
| 24−27
+33.3%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 9
−33.3%
|
12−14
+33.3%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 15
−40%
|
21−24
+40%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 12
−33.3%
|
16−18
+33.3%
|
Battlefield 5 | 12−14
−33.3%
|
16−18
+33.3%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 13
−38.5%
|
18−20
+38.5%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 8−9
−25%
|
10−11
+25%
|
Far Cry 5 | 10−11
−40%
|
14−16
+40%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 12−14
−38.5%
|
18−20
+38.5%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 27−30
−37.9%
|
40−45
+37.9%
|
Hitman 3 | 8
−25%
|
10−11
+25%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 30−35
−29%
|
40−45
+29%
|
Metro Exodus | 20
−35%
|
27−30
+35%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 18
−33.3%
|
24−27
+33.3%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 16−18
−41.2%
|
24−27
+41.2%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 45−50
−33.3%
|
60−65
+33.3%
|
Full HD
High Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 12−14
−38.5%
|
18−20
+38.5%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 4−5
−25%
|
5−6
+25%
|
Battlefield 5 | 12−14
−33.3%
|
16−18
+33.3%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 12
−33.3%
|
16−18
+33.3%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 8−9
−25%
|
10−11
+25%
|
Far Cry 5 | 10−11
−40%
|
14−16
+40%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 12−14
−38.5%
|
18−20
+38.5%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 27−30
−37.9%
|
40−45
+37.9%
|
Hitman 3 | 10−11
−40%
|
14−16
+40%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 30−35
−29%
|
40−45
+29%
|
Metro Exodus | 15
−40%
|
21−24
+40%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 14
−28.6%
|
18−20
+28.6%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 17
−41.2%
|
24−27
+41.2%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 16−18
−41.2%
|
24−27
+41.2%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 45−50
−33.3%
|
60−65
+33.3%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 12−14
−38.5%
|
18−20
+38.5%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 4−5
−25%
|
5−6
+25%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 10−11
−40%
|
14−16
+40%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 8−9
−25%
|
10−11
+25%
|
Far Cry 5 | 10−11
−40%
|
14−16
+40%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 27−30
−37.9%
|
40−45
+37.9%
|
Hitman 3 | 10−11
−40%
|
14−16
+40%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 30−35
−29%
|
40−45
+29%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 14
−28.6%
|
18−20
+28.6%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 9
−33.3%
|
12−14
+33.3%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 45−50
−33.3%
|
60−65
+33.3%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 12
−33.3%
|
16−18
+33.3%
|
1440p
High Preset
Battlefield 5 | 9−10
−33.3%
|
12−14
+33.3%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 7−8
−42.9%
|
10−11
+42.9%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 4−5
−25%
|
5−6
+25%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 4−5
−25%
|
5−6
+25%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 5−6
−40%
|
7−8
+40%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 9−10
−33.3%
|
12−14
+33.3%
|
Hitman 3 | 9−10
−33.3%
|
12−14
+33.3%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 10−12
−27.3%
|
14−16
+27.3%
|
Metro Exodus | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 4−5
−25%
|
5−6
+25%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 27−30
−37.9%
|
40−45
+37.9%
|
1440p
Epic Preset
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 9−10
−33.3%
|
12−14
+33.3%
|
4K
High Preset
Battlefield 5 | 3−4
−33.3%
|
4−5
+33.3%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 3−4
−33.3%
|
4−5
+33.3%
|
Hitman 3 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 4−5
−25%
|
5−6
+25%
|
Metro Exodus | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 0−1 | 0−1 |
4K
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 3−4
−33.3%
|
4−5
+33.3%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Far Cry 5 | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 4−5
−25%
|
5−6
+25%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
4K
Epic Preset
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 5−6
−40%
|
7−8
+40%
|
This is how RX Vega 5 and GTX 780M Mac Edition compete in popular games:
- GTX 780M Mac Edition is 33% faster in 1080p
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 4.64 | 6.69 |
Recency | 7 January 2020 | 8 November 2013 |
Chip lithography | 7 nm | 28 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 122 Watt |
RX Vega 5 has an age advantage of 6 years, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 713.3% lower power consumption.
GTX 780M Mac Edition, on the other hand, has a 44.2% higher aggregate performance score.
The GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX Vega 5 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.