ATI Radeon Xpress 2100 IGP vs RX Vega 3

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking846not rated
Place by popularity96not in top-100
Power efficiency14.08no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code namePicassoRS780
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date6 January 2019 (6 years ago)4 March 2008 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores19240
Core clock speed300 MHz500 MHz
Boost clock speed1001 MHzno data
Number of transistors4,940 million180 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Wattno data
Texture fill rate12.012.000
Floating-point processing power0.3844 TFLOPS0.04 TFLOPS
ROPs44
TMUs124

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 1.0 x16
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)10.0 (10_0)
Shader Model6.44.1
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL2.01.0
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 January 2019 4 March 2008
Chip lithography 14 nm 65 nm

RX Vega 3 has an age advantage of 10 years, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 3 and Radeon Xpress 2100 IGP. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 3 is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Xpress 2100 IGP is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 3
Radeon RX Vega 3
ATI Radeon Xpress 2100 IGP
Radeon Xpress 2100 IGP

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 2235 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate Radeon Xpress 2100 IGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega 3 or Radeon Xpress 2100 IGP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.