Quadro T1000 Max-Q vs Radeon RX Vega 11

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Radeon RX Vega 11 Radeon RX Vega 11 Efficient Radeon RX Vega 11 Embedded Radeon Vega 3 Efficient Radeon Vega 6 Embedded Radeon Vega 8 Efficient Radeon Vega 8 Embedded Radeon Vega 11 Embedded
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Quadro T400 Mobile Quadro T500 Mobile Quadro T600 Mobile Quadro T1000 Mobile Quadro T1000 Max-Q Quadro T1200 Max-Q Quadro T1200 Mobile Quadro T2000 Mobile Quadro T2000 Max-Q T500 Max-Q T550 Mobile T600 Max-Q

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX Vega 11 with Quadro T1000 Max-Q, including specs and performance data.

RX Vega 11
2018
35 Watt
5.42

T1000 Max-Q outperforms RX Vega 11 by a whopping 220% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

RX Vega 11 RX Vega 11
T1000 Max-Q T1000 Max-Q

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking618323
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency10.7524.10
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameRavenTU117
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date10 May 2018 (6 years ago)27 May 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores704896
Core clock speed300 MHz765 MHz
Boost clock speed1251 MHz1350 MHz
Number of transistors4,940 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate55.0475.60
Floating-point processing power1.761 TFLOPS2.419 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs4456

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x16
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data80 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsMotherboard DependentNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.7 (6.4)6.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.31.2
CUDA-7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RX Vega 11 5.42
T1000 Max-Q 17.36
+220%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX Vega 11 2108
T1000 Max-Q 6754
+220%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD28
−204%
85−90
+204%
1440p6
−200%
18−20
+200%
4K12
−192%
35−40
+192%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 12−14
−258%
40−45
+258%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−150%
30−33
+150%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−240%
30−35
+240%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 12−14
−258%
40−45
+258%
Battlefield 5 31
−126%
70−75
+126%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−150%
30−33
+150%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−240%
30−35
+240%
Far Cry 5 19
−195%
55−60
+195%
Fortnite 86
−4.7%
90−95
+4.7%
Forza Horizon 4 38
−78.9%
65−70
+78.9%
Forza Horizon 5 10−12
−309%
45−50
+309%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 20−22
−205%
60−65
+205%
Valorant 60−65
−110%
130−140
+110%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 12−14
−258%
40−45
+258%
Battlefield 5 26
−169%
70−75
+169%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−150%
30−33
+150%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 85−90
−141%
210−220
+141%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−240%
30−35
+240%
Dota 2 46
−115%
95−100
+115%
Far Cry 5 18
−211%
55−60
+211%
Fortnite 31
−190%
90−95
+190%
Forza Horizon 4 35
−94.3%
65−70
+94.3%
Forza Horizon 5 10−12
−309%
45−50
+309%
Grand Theft Auto V 17
−265%
60−65
+265%
Metro Exodus 9
−289%
35−40
+289%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 20−22
−205%
60−65
+205%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14
−221%
45−50
+221%
Valorant 60−65
−110%
130−140
+110%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 25
−180%
70−75
+180%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−150%
30−33
+150%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−240%
30−35
+240%
Dota 2 42
−136%
95−100
+136%
Far Cry 5 17
−229%
55−60
+229%
Forza Horizon 4 29
−134%
65−70
+134%
Forza Horizon 5 10−12
−309%
45−50
+309%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 20−22
−205%
60−65
+205%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10
−350%
45−50
+350%
Valorant 60−65
−110%
130−140
+110%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 30−35
−190%
90−95
+190%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 35−40
−210%
120−130
+210%
Grand Theft Auto V 6−7
−350%
27−30
+350%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−425%
21−24
+425%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
−360%
160−170
+360%
Valorant 55−60
−186%
160−170
+186%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
−683%
45−50
+683%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−157%
18−20
+157%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−275%
14−16
+275%
Far Cry 5 10−11
−270%
35−40
+270%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−242%
40−45
+242%
Forza Horizon 5 8−9
−275%
30−33
+275%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
−225%
24−27
+225%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 10−11
−270%
35−40
+270%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 4−5
−225%
12−14
+225%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−76.5%
30−33
+76.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−1050%
21−24
+1050%
Valorant 24−27
−254%
90−95
+254%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 8
−200%
24−27
+200%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%
Dota 2 17
−241%
55−60
+241%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−260%
18−20
+260%
Forza Horizon 4 12
−142%
27−30
+142%
Forza Horizon 5 3−4
−367%
14−16
+367%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
−220%
16−18
+220%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 5−6
−220%
16−18
+220%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

This is how RX Vega 11 and T1000 Max-Q compete in popular games:

  • T1000 Max-Q is 204% faster in 1080p
  • T1000 Max-Q is 200% faster in 1440p
  • T1000 Max-Q is 192% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the T1000 Max-Q is 1050% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • T1000 Max-Q is ahead in 64 tests (96%)
  • there's a draw in 3 tests (4%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 5.42 17.36
Recency 10 May 2018 27 May 2019
Chip lithography 14 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 50 Watt

RX Vega 11 has 42.9% lower power consumption.

T1000 Max-Q, on the other hand, has a 220.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro T1000 Max-Q is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX Vega 11 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 11 is a desktop card while Quadro T1000 Max-Q is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon RX Vega 11
Radeon RX Vega 11
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q
Quadro T1000 Max-Q
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

RX Vega 11 Radeon RX Vega 11
vs
Radeon 550 Radeon 550
T1000 Max-Q Quadro T1000 Max-Q
vs
Pro 5500M Radeon Pro 5500M
RX Vega 11 Radeon RX Vega 11
vs
R7 350 Radeon R7 350
RX Vega 10 AMD RX Vega 10
vs
7100 + nForce 630i 7100 + nForce 630i
RX Vega 10 AMD RX Vega 10
vs
Graphics 448SP Mobile Graphics 448SP Mobile
Tesla P100 SXM2 NVIDIA P100 SXM2
vs
L40S
RX Vega M GH AMD RX Vega M GH
vs
Quadro K2000 K2000
GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q NVIDIA GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
vs
RTX A3000 Mobile 12 GB Mobile 12 GB
GTX 1060 6 GB Rev. 2 NVIDIA 1060 6 GB Rev. 2
vs
RTX 4090 Max-Q 4090 Max-Q
Pro Vega 64 AMD Pro Vega 64
vs
RTX 2080 Ti 2080 Ti
R7 350 AMD R7 350
vs
FX 380 380
RTX 2080 Ti 2080 Ti
vs
RX 580 OEM 580 OEM
RX 580 OEM AMD RX 580 OEM
vs
Arc A750 A750

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.9 1831 vote

Rate Radeon RX Vega 11 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 18 votes

Rate Quadro T1000 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega 11 or Quadro T1000 Max-Q, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.