Radeon E8870 MXM vs RX Vega 3

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking847not rated
Place by popularity93not in top-100
Power efficiency14.09no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code namePicassoSaturn
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date6 January 2019 (7 years ago)29 September 2015 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192768
Core clock speed300 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speed1001 MHzno data
Number of transistors4,940 million2,080 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate12.0148.00
Floating-point processing power0.3844 TFLOPS1.536 TFLOPS
ROPs416
TMUs1248
L1 Cacheno data192 KB
L2 Cacheno data256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPMXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data96 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_0)
Shader Model6.46.5 (6.0)
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.1
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.170

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 January 2019 29 September 2015
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 75 Watt

RX Vega 3 has an age advantage of 3 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 400% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 3 and Radeon E8870 MXM. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 3
Radeon RX Vega 3
AMD Radeon E8870 MXM
Radeon E8870 MXM

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 2253 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon E8870 MXM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega 3 or Radeon E8870 MXM, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.