N1 16SM vs Radeon RX Vega 3

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking855not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency14.23no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026)
GPU code namePicassoGB20B
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date6 January 2019 (7 years ago)1 June 2026 (recently)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1922048
Core clock speed300 MHz1665 MHz
Boost clock speed1001 MHz2418 MHz
Number of transistors4,940 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Wattno data
Texture fill rate12.01309.5
Floating-point processing power0.3844 TFLOPS9.904 TFLOPS
ROPs424
TMUs12128
Tensor Coresno data64
Ray Tracing Coresno data16
L1 Cacheno data2 MB
L2 Cacheno data50 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 5.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedLPDDR5X
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared128 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1067 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data273.2 GB/s
Shared memory+no data
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)N/A
Shader Model6.4N/A
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA-12.1
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 January 2019 1 June 2026
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm

N1 16SM has an age advantage of 7 years, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 3 and N1 16SM. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 2281 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate N1 16SM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega 3 or N1 16SM, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.