N1X 40SM vs Radeon RX Vega 3

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking860not rated
Place by popularity83not in top-100
Power efficiency14.23no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026)
GPU code namePicassoGB20B
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date20 November 2019 (6 years ago)1 June 2026 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1925120
Core clock speed300 MHz741 MHz
Boost clock speed1100 MHz2346 MHz
Number of transistors4,940 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology12 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Wattno data
Texture fill rate13.20750.7
Floating-point processing power0.4224 TFLOPS24.02 TFLOPS
ROPs440
TMUs12320
Tensor Coresno data160
Ray Tracing Coresno data40
L1 Cacheno data5 MB
L2 Cacheno data50 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 5.0 x16
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedLPDDR5X
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared128 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1067 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data273.2 GB/s
Shared memory+no data
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsMotherboard Dependent1x HDMI
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)N/A
Shader Model6.7N/A
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.3N/A
CUDA-12.1
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 20 November 2019 1 June 2026
Chip lithography 12 nm 5 nm

N1X 40SM has an age advantage of 6 years, and a 140% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 3 and N1X 40SM. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 3 is a desktop graphics card while N1X 40SM is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 2289 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate N1X 40SM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega 3 or N1X 40SM, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.