Matrox Parhelia Precision SDT vs Radeon RX Vega 3

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking845not rated
Place by popularity96not in top-100
Power efficiency14.05no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Parhelia (2002−2006)
GPU code namePicassoParhelia-512
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date6 January 2019 (6 years ago)2003 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192no data
Core clock speed300 MHz200 MHz
Boost clock speed1001 MHzno data
Number of transistors4,940 million80 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Wattno data
Texture fill rate12.013.200
Floating-point processing power0.3844 TFLOPSno data
ROPs44
TMUs1216

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCI-X
Lengthno data190 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared256 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared500 MBps
Memory bandwidthno data4 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)8.1
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.61.3
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 14 nm 150 nm

RX Vega 3 has a 971.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 3 and Matrox Parhelia Precision SDT. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 3 is a notebook graphics card while Matrox Parhelia Precision SDT is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 3
Radeon RX Vega 3
Matrox Parhelia Precision SDT
Parhelia Precision SDT

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 2230 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate Matrox Parhelia Precision SDT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega 3 or Matrox Parhelia Precision SDT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.