Radeon RX Vega 3 vs Matrox Parhelia PCI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated842
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data14.06
ArchitectureParhelia (2002−2006)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameParhelia-512Picasso
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date2003 (22 years ago)6 January 2019 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data192
Core clock speed200 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1001 MHz
Number of transistors80 million4,940 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data15 Watt
Texture fill rate3.20012.01
Floating-point processing powerno data0.3844 TFLOPS
ROPs44
TMUs1612

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCI-XIGP
Length190 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount256 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed500 MBpsSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth4 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVINo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.112 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGL1.34.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 150 nm 14 nm

RX Vega 3 has a 971.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Matrox Parhelia PCI and Radeon RX Vega 3. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Matrox Parhelia PCI is a desktop graphics card while Radeon RX Vega 3 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Matrox Parhelia PCI
Parhelia PCI
AMD Radeon RX Vega 3
Radeon RX Vega 3

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Matrox Parhelia PCI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 2217 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Matrox Parhelia PCI or Radeon RX Vega 3, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.