GeForce GTX 470 X2 vs Radeon RX Vega 3

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking842not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency14.06no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code namePicassoGF100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date6 January 2019 (6 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192352
Core clock speed300 MHz608 MHz
Boost clock speed1001 MHzno data
Number of transistors4,940 million3,100 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt215 Watt
Texture fill rate12.0126.75
Floating-point processing power0.3844 TFLOPSno data
ROPs432
TMUs1244

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 2.0 x16
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared1 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared3.3 GB/s
Memory bandwidthno data107.1 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs3x DVI

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA-2.0

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 14 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 215 Watt

RX Vega 3 has a 185.7% more advanced lithography process, and 1333.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 3 and GeForce GTX 470 X2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 3 is a notebook graphics card while GeForce GTX 470 X2 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 3
Radeon RX Vega 3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 X2
GeForce GTX 470 X2

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 2216 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 3 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 470 X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega 3 or GeForce GTX 470 X2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.