Arc G3 vs Radeon RX Vega 3

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking855not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency14.23no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Xe3-LPG (2026)
GPU code namePicassoPanther Lake
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date6 January 2019 (7 years ago)1 June 2026 (recently)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1921280
Core clock speed300 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1001 MHz2400 MHz
Number of transistors4,940 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate12.0196.00
Floating-point processing power0.3844 TFLOPS6.144 TFLOPS
ROPs420
TMUs1240
Ray Tracing Coresno data10
L1 Cacheno data640 KB
L2 Cacheno data16 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.9
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.4

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 January 2019 1 June 2026
Chip lithography 14 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 25 Watt

RX Vega 3 has 67% lower power consumption.

Arc G3, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, and a 367% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 3 and Arc G3. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 2281 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Arc G3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega 3 or Arc G3, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.