Radeon RX 6700M vs RX Vega 2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated188
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data18.30
ArchitectureVega (2017−2020)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameVega Raven RidgeNavi 22
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date7 January 2018 (7 years ago)31 May 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1282304
Core clock speedno data1489 MHz
Boost clock speed1100 MHz2400 MHz
Number of transistorsno data17,200 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt135 Watt
Texture fill rateno data345.6
Floating-point processing powerno data11.06 TFLOPS
ROPsno data64
TMUsno data144
Ray Tracing Coresno data36
L0 Cacheno data576 KB
L1 Cacheno data512 KB
L2 Cacheno data3 MB
L3 Cacheno data80 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data10 GB
Memory bus widthno data160 Bit
Memory clock speedno data2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data320.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.1
Vulkan-1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 January 2018 31 May 2021
Chip lithography 12 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 135 Watt

RX Vega 2 has 800% lower power consumption.

RX 6700M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, and a 71.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 2 and Radeon RX 6700M. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 2
Radeon RX Vega 2
AMD Radeon RX 6700M
Radeon RX 6700M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 252 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 132 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6700M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega 2 or Radeon RX 6700M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.