UHD Graphics 770 vs Radeon RX Vega 11
Aggregated performance score
UHD Graphics 770 outperforms Radeon RX Vega 11 by 12% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | 572 | 547 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | 20 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.77 | 1.26 |
| Architecture | Vega (2017−2021) | Alder Lake |
| GPU code name | Vega Raven Ridge | Alder Lake xG |
| Market segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Release date | 26 October 2017 (6 years ago) | 4 January 2022 (2 years ago) |
| Current price | $475 | $878 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
UHD Graphics 770 has 64% better value for money than RX Vega 11.
Detailed specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 704 | 32 |
| Boost clock speed | 1240 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 4,940 million | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 61.60 | 26.40 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,760 gflops | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | IGP | Ring Bus |
| Width | IGP | IGP |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | System Shared | System Shared |
| Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | System Shared |
| Memory bus width | System Shared | System Shared |
| Memory clock speed | System Shared | 1550 MHz |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
API compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.3 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
UHD Graphics 770 outperforms Radeon RX Vega 11 by 12% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Benchmark coverage: 25%
UHD Graphics 770 outperforms Radeon RX Vega 11 by 30% in Passmark.
3DMark 11 Performance GPU
3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.
Benchmark coverage: 17%
UHD Graphics 770 outperforms Radeon RX Vega 11 by 200% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.
Benchmark coverage: 14%
Radeon RX Vega 11 outperforms UHD Graphics 770 by 28% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.
3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.
Benchmark coverage: 14%
UHD Graphics 770 outperforms Radeon RX Vega 11 by 762% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 28
+64.7%
| 17
−64.7%
|
| 1440p | 6
+0%
| 6−7
+0%
|
| 4K | 12
−8.3%
| 13
+8.3%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 9−10
−33.3%
|
12
+33.3%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 20
+66.7%
|
12−14
−66.7%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 5−6
−160%
|
13
+160%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 31
+63.2%
|
18−20
−63.2%
|
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 16−18
−5.9%
|
18−20
+5.9%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 9−10
−11.1%
|
10
+11.1%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 19
+11.8%
|
17
−11.8%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 18
+20%
|
14−16
−20%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 38
+81%
|
21−24
−81%
|
| Hitman 3 | 12−14
−58.3%
|
19
+58.3%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 10−11
−40%
|
14
+40%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 10−11
−10%
|
10−12
+10%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 19
+35.7%
|
14−16
−35.7%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 8−9
−12.5%
|
9−10
+12.5%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 16
+33.3%
|
12−14
−33.3%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 5−6
−40%
|
7−8
+40%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 26
+36.8%
|
18−20
−36.8%
|
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 16−18
−5.9%
|
18−20
+5.9%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 9−10
−11.1%
|
10−11
+11.1%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 18
+12.5%
|
16
−12.5%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 16
+6.7%
|
14−16
−6.7%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 35
+66.7%
|
21−24
−66.7%
|
| Hitman 3 | 12−14
+50%
|
8
−50%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 10−11
+66.7%
|
6
−66.7%
|
| Metro Exodus | 9
+80%
|
5
−80%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 10−11
−10%
|
10−12
+10%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 16
+14.3%
|
14−16
−14.3%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 14
−28.6%
|
18
+28.6%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 8−9
−12.5%
|
9−10
+12.5%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 11
−9.1%
|
12−14
+9.1%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 5−6
−40%
|
7−8
+40%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 25
+31.6%
|
18−20
−31.6%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 9−10
−11.1%
|
10−11
+11.1%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 17
+21.4%
|
14
−21.4%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 16
+6.7%
|
14−16
−6.7%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 29
+38.1%
|
21−24
−38.1%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 10
+11.1%
|
9
−11.1%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 8−9
−12.5%
|
9−10
+12.5%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 8−9
−12.5%
|
9−10
+12.5%
|
| Hitman 3 | 9−10
−11.1%
|
10−11
+11.1%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 3−4
−33.3%
|
4−5
+33.3%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 8−9
−12.5%
|
9−10
+12.5%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 2−3
−100%
|
4−5
+100%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
−50%
|
3−4
+50%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 8−9
−12.5%
|
9−10
+12.5%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 5−6
−40%
|
7−8
+40%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 7−8
−28.6%
|
9−10
+28.6%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
4K
High Preset
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
| Hitman 3 | 5−6
−20%
|
6−7
+20%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 8−9
+0%
|
8−9
+0%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 4
+100%
|
2−3
−100%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 2−3
−50%
|
3−4
+50%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 5
+66.7%
|
3−4
−66.7%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 8
+300%
|
2−3
−300%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Far Cry 5 | 5−6
−20%
|
6−7
+20%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 7−8
−14.3%
|
8−9
+14.3%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 12
+140%
|
5−6
−140%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 0−1 | 1−2 |
This is how RX Vega 11 and UHD Graphics 770 compete in popular games:
- RX Vega 11 is 64.7% faster than UHD Graphics 770 in 1080p
- UHD Graphics 770 is 0% faster than RX Vega 11 in 1440p
- UHD Graphics 770 is 8.3% faster than RX Vega 11 in 4K
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Battlefield 5, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX Vega 11 is 300% faster than the UHD Graphics 770.
- in Assassin's Creed Valhalla, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the UHD Graphics 770 is 160% faster than the RX Vega 11.
All in all, in popular games:
- RX Vega 11 is ahead in 24 tests (38%)
- UHD Graphics 770 is ahead in 31 test (48%)
- there's a draw in 9 tests (14%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 5.48 | 6.13 |
| Recency | 26 October 2017 | 4 January 2022 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 15 Watt |
The UHD Graphics 770 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX Vega 11 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
