UHD Graphics 620 vs Radeon RX Vega 11

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX Vega 11 with UHD Graphics 620, including specs and performance data.

RX Vega 11
2018
35 Watt
5.48
+104%

RX Vega 11 outperforms UHD Graphics 620 by a whopping 104% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking608811
Place by popularitynot in top-10027
Power efficiency10.8012.33
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameRavenKaby Lake GT2
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date10 May 2018 (6 years ago)1 September 2017 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores704192
Core clock speed300 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1251 MHz1000 MHz
Number of transistors4,940 million189 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm14 nm++
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate55.0424.00
Floating-point processing power1.761 TFLOPS0.384 TFLOPS
ROPs83
TMUs4424

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPRing Bus
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedLPDDR3/DDR4
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared32 GB
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsMotherboard DependentPortable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.7 (6.4)6.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.31.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX Vega 11 5.48
+104%
UHD Graphics 620 2.68

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX Vega 11 2109
+105%
UHD Graphics 620 1030

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RX Vega 11 5483
+214%
UHD Graphics 620 1744

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RX Vega 11 3494
+199%
UHD Graphics 620 1168

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RX Vega 11 20848
+124%
UHD Graphics 620 9324

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

RX Vega 11 157382
+77.3%
UHD Graphics 620 88746

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

RX Vega 11 936
+146%
UHD Graphics 620 380

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD28
+115%
13
−115%
1440p5
−220%
16
+220%
4K12
+33.3%
9
−33.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+83.3%
6
−83.3%
Elden Ring 14−16
+180%
5−6
−180%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
+183%
6−7
−183%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+83.3%
6−7
−83.3%
Forza Horizon 4 20
+100%
10
−100%
Metro Exodus 18
+200%
6
−200%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+77.8%
9
−77.8%
Valorant 14−16
+66.7%
9
−66.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
+183%
6−7
−183%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+83.3%
6−7
−83.3%
Dota 2 27
+170%
10
−170%
Elden Ring 14−16
+180%
5−6
−180%
Far Cry 5 30
+150%
12
−150%
Fortnite 30−35
+129%
14−16
−129%
Forza Horizon 4 17
+54.5%
11
−54.5%
Grand Theft Auto V 17
+240%
5
−240%
Metro Exodus 11
+267%
3
−267%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 54
+100%
27
−100%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+60%
10−11
−60%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+80%
10−11
−80%
Valorant 14−16
+114%
7−8
−114%
World of Tanks 85−90
+138%
37
−138%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
+183%
6−7
−183%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+83.3%
6−7
−83.3%
Dota 2 42
+133%
18
−133%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+62.5%
16−18
−62.5%
Forza Horizon 4 15
+7.1%
14
−7.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+84%
24−27
−84%
Valorant 14−16
+114%
7−8
−114%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 5−6 0−1
Elden Ring 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Grand Theft Auto V 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+84.2%
18−20
−84.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
World of Tanks 35−40
+117%
18−20
−117%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+57.1%
7−8
−57.1%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Metro Exodus 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Valorant 14−16
+66.7%
9−10
−66.7%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 16−18
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%
Elden Ring 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+13.3%
14−16
−13.3%
Metro Exodus 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 15
+114%
7−8
−114%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+13.3%
14−16
−13.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Dota 2 17
+143%
7
−143%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Fortnite 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Valorant 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%

This is how RX Vega 11 and UHD Graphics 620 compete in popular games:

  • RX Vega 11 is 115% faster in 1080p
  • UHD Graphics 620 is 220% faster in 1440p
  • RX Vega 11 is 33% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Grand Theft Auto V, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the RX Vega 11 is 400% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX Vega 11 is ahead in 53 tests (98%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.48 2.68
Recency 10 May 2018 1 September 2017
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 15 Watt

RX Vega 11 has a 104.5% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 8 months.

UHD Graphics 620, on the other hand, has 133.3% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX Vega 11 is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics 620 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 11 is a desktop card while UHD Graphics 620 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 11
Radeon RX Vega 11
Intel UHD Graphics 620
UHD Graphics 620

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 1815 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 11 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 4553 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.