Radeon Pro W6600M vs RX Vega 11

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Radeon RX Vega 11 Radeon RX Vega 11 Efficient Radeon RX Vega 11 Embedded Radeon Vega 3 Efficient Radeon Vega 6 Embedded Radeon Vega 8 Efficient Radeon Vega 8 Embedded Radeon Vega 11 Embedded
VS
Radeon Pro W5300M Radeon Pro W5500M Radeon Pro W6300M Radeon Pro W6600M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX Vega 11 with Radeon Pro W6600M, including specs and performance data.

RX Vega 11
2018
35 Watt
5.47

Pro W6600M outperforms RX Vega 11 by a whopping 428% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

RX Vega 11 RX Vega 11
Pro W6600M Pro W6600M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking616201
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency10.7322.05
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameRavenNavi 23
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date10 May 2018 (6 years ago)8 June 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7041792
Core clock speed300 MHz1224 MHz
Boost clock speed1251 MHz2034 MHz
Number of transistors4,940 million11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt90 Watt
Texture fill rate55.04227.8
Floating-point processing power1.761 TFLOPS7.29 TFLOPS
ROPs864
TMUs44112
Ray Tracing Coresno data28

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x16
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data224.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsMotherboard DependentPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.7 (6.4)6.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.12.1
Vulkan1.31.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RX Vega 11 5.47
Pro W6600M 28.89
+428%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX Vega 11 2108
Pro W6600M 11131
+428%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD28
−400%
140−150
+400%
1440p6
−400%
30−35
+400%
4K12
−400%
60−65
+400%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 12−14
−533%
75−80
+533%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−358%
55−60
+358%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−500%
60−65
+500%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 12−14
−533%
75−80
+533%
Battlefield 5 31
−235%
100−110
+235%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−358%
55−60
+358%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−500%
60−65
+500%
Far Cry 5 19
−368%
85−90
+368%
Fortnite 86
−50%
120−130
+50%
Forza Horizon 4 38
−182%
100−110
+182%
Forza Horizon 5 10−12
−609%
75−80
+609%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 20−22
−435%
100−110
+435%
Valorant 60−65
−187%
170−180
+187%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 12−14
−533%
75−80
+533%
Battlefield 5 26
−300%
100−110
+300%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−358%
55−60
+358%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 85−90
−203%
260−270
+203%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−500%
60−65
+500%
Dota 2 46
−180%
120−130
+180%
Far Cry 5 18
−394%
85−90
+394%
Fortnite 31
−316%
120−130
+316%
Forza Horizon 4 35
−206%
100−110
+206%
Forza Horizon 5 10−12
−609%
75−80
+609%
Grand Theft Auto V 17
−471%
95−100
+471%
Metro Exodus 9
−578%
60−65
+578%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 20−22
−435%
100−110
+435%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14
−500%
80−85
+500%
Valorant 60−65
−187%
170−180
+187%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 25
−316%
100−110
+316%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−358%
55−60
+358%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−500%
60−65
+500%
Dota 2 42
−207%
120−130
+207%
Far Cry 5 17
−424%
85−90
+424%
Forza Horizon 4 29
−269%
100−110
+269%
Forza Horizon 5 10−12
−609%
75−80
+609%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 20−22
−435%
100−110
+435%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10
−740%
80−85
+740%
Valorant 60−65
−187%
170−180
+187%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 30−35
−316%
120−130
+316%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 35−40
−385%
180−190
+385%
Grand Theft Auto V 6−7
−750%
50−55
+750%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−825%
35−40
+825%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
−400%
170−180
+400%
Valorant 55−60
−281%
210−220
+281%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
−1133%
70−75
+1133%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−400%
35−40
+400%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−600%
27−30
+600%
Far Cry 5 10−11
−530%
60−65
+530%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−492%
70−75
+492%
Forza Horizon 5 8−9
−500%
45−50
+500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
−475%
45−50
+475%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 10−11
−560%
65−70
+560%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 4−5
−450%
21−24
+450%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−206%
50−55
+206%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−4000%
40−45
+4000%
Valorant 24−27
−515%
160−170
+515%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 8
−425%
40−45
+425%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%
Dota 2 17
−406%
85−90
+406%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−540%
30−35
+540%
Forza Horizon 4 12
−300%
45−50
+300%
Forza Horizon 5 3−4
−800%
27−30
+800%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
−500%
30−33
+500%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 5−6
−520%
30−35
+520%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

This is how RX Vega 11 and Pro W6600M compete in popular games:

  • Pro W6600M is 400% faster in 1080p
  • Pro W6600M is 400% faster in 1440p
  • Pro W6600M is 400% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the Pro W6600M is 4000% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Pro W6600M is ahead in 63 tests (94%)
  • there's a draw in 4 tests (6%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 5.47 28.89
Recency 10 May 2018 8 June 2021
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 90 Watt

RX Vega 11 has 157.1% lower power consumption.

Pro W6600M, on the other hand, has a 428.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon Pro W6600M is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX Vega 11 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 11 is a desktop card while Radeon Pro W6600M is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon RX Vega 11
Radeon RX Vega 11
AMD Radeon Pro W6600M
Radeon Pro W6600M
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

RX Vega 11 Radeon RX Vega 11
vs
Radeon 550 Radeon 550
Pro W6600M Radeon Pro W6600M
vs
RTX A4500 Embedded RTX A4500 Embedded
RX Vega 11 Radeon RX Vega 11
vs
R7 350 Radeon R7 350
UHD Graphics 600 UHD Graphics 600
vs
Radeon 890M 890M
RX Vega M RX Vega M
vs
RX Vega 3 Vega 3
RX Vega M GH RX Vega M GH
vs
T2000 Max-Q T2000 Max-Q
GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
vs
RTX A500 RTX A500
GTX 1050 Max-Q GTX 1050 Max-Q
vs
Apple M1 7-Core GPU M1 7 Core GPU
RX Vega 3 RX Vega 3
vs
Pro V620 Pro V620
RX Vega 3 RX Vega 3
vs
Apple M3 Pro 14-Core GPU M3 Pro 14-Core GPU
Quadro P620 P620
vs
RX 7900 XT RX 7900 XT
Pro Vega 64 Pro Vega 64
vs
RX 580X RX 580X
Pro Vega 64 Pro Vega 64
vs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.9 1831 vote

Rate Radeon RX Vega 11 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 4 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W6600M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega 11 or Radeon Pro W6600M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.