Radeon HD 7340 vs RX Vega 11
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in performance ranking | 573 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.76 | no data |
Architecture | Vega (2017−2021) | Terascale 2 (2009−2015) |
GPU code name | Vega Raven Ridge | Zacate |
Market segment | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 26 October 2017 (6 years ago) | 1 May 2012 (12 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $552.69 |
Current price | $475 | $199 (0.4x MSRP) |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Detailed specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 704 | 80 |
Core clock speed | no data | 523 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1240 MHz | 680 MHz |
Number of transistors | 4,940 million | 450 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 18 Watt |
Texture fill rate | 61.60 | 4.184 |
Floating-point performance | 1,760 gflops | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on Radeon RX Vega 11 and Radeon HD 7340 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
Interface | IGP | IGP |
Width | IGP | no data |
Supplementary power connectors | None | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | System Shared | System Shared |
Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | System Shared |
Memory bus width | System Shared | System Shared |
Memory clock speed | System Shared | System Shared |
Shared memory | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
API compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 11.2 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Benchmark coverage: 25%
RX Vega 11 outperforms HD 7340 by 1286% in Passmark.
3DMark 11 Performance GPU
3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.
Benchmark coverage: 17%
RX Vega 11 outperforms HD 7340 by 1554% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.
Benchmark coverage: 14%
RX Vega 11 outperforms HD 7340 by 1460% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.
3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.
Benchmark coverage: 14%
RX Vega 11 outperforms HD 7340 by 993% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 26 October 2017 | 1 May 2012 |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 18 Watt |
We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 11 and Radeon HD 7340. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 11 is a desktop card while Radeon HD 7340 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.