Quadro NVS 5100M vs Radeon RX Vega 11

Place in performance ranking	574	1086
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.72	0.04
Architecture	Vega (2017−2021)	GT2xx (2009−2012)
GPU code name	Vega Raven Ridge	N10P-NS
Market segment	Desktop	Mobile workstation
Release date	26 October 2017 (6 years ago)	7 January 2010 (14 years ago)
Current price	$475	$105

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX Vega 11 has 1700% better value for money than NVS 5100M.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	704	48
Core clock speed	no data	550 MHz
Boost clock speed	1240 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	4,940 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	35 Watt
Texture fill rate	61.60	no data
Floating-point performance	1,760 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon RX Vega 11 and Quadro NVS 5100M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	no data	medium sized
Interface	IGP	no data
Width	IGP	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	System Shared	DDR3
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	1 GB
Memory bus width	System Shared	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	System Shared	800 MHz
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	10.1
Shader Model	6.4	no data
OpenGL	4.6	no data
OpenCL	2.0	no data
Vulkan	1.2.131	no data

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	29 +625%	4−5 −625%
1440p	6 +500%	1−2 −500%
4K	12 +500%	2−3 −500%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

9−10

no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	20	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5−6	0−1
Battlefield 5	23 +667%	3−4 −667%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10	no data
Far Cry 5	22	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	25	no data
Forza Horizon 4	38	no data
Hitman 3	10−11	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	27−30	no data
Metro Exodus	33 +560%	5−6 −560%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	20	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	24−27	no data

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	16	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5−6	0−1
Battlefield 5	14−16 +650%	2−3 −650%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10	no data
Far Cry 5	19	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	19	no data
Forza Horizon 4	78	no data
Hitman 3	10−11	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	27−30	no data
Metro Exodus	8 +700%	1−2 −700%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	17	no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	24−27	no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	11	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5−6	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10	no data
Far Cry 5	14	no data
Forza Horizon 4	29	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	27−30	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	15	no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	24−27	no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

14−16

no data

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	10−11	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	8−9	no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	7−8	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3	no data
Far Cry 5	8−9	no data
Forza Horizon 4	9−10	no data
Hitman 3	10−11	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14	no data
Metro Exodus	4−5	0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	0−1	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	2−3	0−1

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

10−11

no data

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	4−5	0−1
Far Cry New Dawn	4−5	no data
Hitman 3	2−3	0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn	6−7	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	2−3	0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	0−1
Far Cry 5	3−4	no data
Forza Horizon 4	12 +500%	2−3 −500%
Horizon Zero Dawn	6−7	no data
Metro Exodus	7−8	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	2−3	0−1