Iris Plus Graphics 950 vs Radeon RX Vega 11

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX Vega 11 and Iris Plus Graphics 950, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX Vega 11
2018
35 Watt
5.49

Iris Plus Graphics 950 outperforms RX Vega 11 by a moderate 19% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking611576
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency10.8230.11
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Generation 11.0 (2019−2021)
GPU code nameRavenIce Lake GT2
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date10 May 2018 (6 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores704512
Core clock speed300 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed1251 MHz1000 MHz
Number of transistors4,940 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate55.0432.00
Floating-point processing power1.761 TFLOPS1.024 TFLOPS
ROPs88
TMUs4432

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x1
WidthIGPIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsMotherboard DependentNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.7 (6.4)no data
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.1no data
Vulkan1.3-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX Vega 11 5.49
Iris Plus Graphics 950 6.55
+19.3%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX Vega 11 2109
Iris Plus Graphics 950 2519
+19.4%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD28
−7.1%
30−35
+7.1%
1440p5
+0%
5−6
+0%
4K12
−16.7%
14−16
+16.7%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−12
−9.1%
12−14
+9.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−16.7%
14−16
+16.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
−5.9%
18−20
+5.9%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
−9.1%
12−14
+9.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−16.7%
14−16
+16.7%
Forza Horizon 4 20
−5%
21−24
+5%
Forza Horizon 5 10−12
−9.1%
12−14
+9.1%
Metro Exodus 18
−16.7%
21−24
+16.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
−12.5%
18−20
+12.5%
Valorant 16−18
−5.9%
18−20
+5.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
−5.9%
18−20
+5.9%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
−9.1%
12−14
+9.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−16.7%
14−16
+16.7%
Dota 2 27
−11.1%
30−33
+11.1%
Far Cry 5 30
−16.7%
35−40
+16.7%
Fortnite 30−35
−9.4%
35−40
+9.4%
Forza Horizon 4 17
−5.9%
18−20
+5.9%
Forza Horizon 5 10−12
−9.1%
12−14
+9.1%
Grand Theft Auto V 17
−5.9%
18−20
+5.9%
Metro Exodus 11
−9.1%
12−14
+9.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 54
−11.1%
60−65
+11.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
−12.5%
18−20
+12.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−16.7%
21−24
+16.7%
Valorant 16−18
−5.9%
18−20
+5.9%
World of Tanks 85−90
−13.6%
100−105
+13.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
−5.9%
18−20
+5.9%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
−9.1%
12−14
+9.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−16.7%
14−16
+16.7%
Dota 2 42
−19%
50−55
+19%
Far Cry 5 24−27
−15.4%
30−33
+15.4%
Forza Horizon 4 15
−6.7%
16−18
+6.7%
Forza Horizon 5 10−12
−9.1%
12−14
+9.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
−8.7%
50−55
+8.7%
Valorant 16−18
−5.9%
18−20
+5.9%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
−14.3%
40−45
+14.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
World of Tanks 35−40
−15.4%
45−50
+15.4%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
−12.9%
35−40
+12.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−9.1%
12−14
+9.1%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Forza Horizon 5 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
Metro Exodus 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
Valorant 14−16
−6.7%
16−18
+6.7%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 16−18
−5.9%
18−20
+5.9%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−5.9%
18−20
+5.9%
Metro Exodus 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 15
−6.7%
16−18
+6.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−5.9%
18−20
+5.9%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dota 2 17
−5.9%
18−20
+5.9%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%
Fortnite 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Valorant 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

This is how RX Vega 11 and Iris Plus Graphics 950 compete in popular games:

  • Iris Plus Graphics 950 is 7% faster in 1080p
  • A tie in 1440p
  • Iris Plus Graphics 950 is 17% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.49 6.55
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 15 Watt

Iris Plus Graphics 950 has a 19.3% higher aggregate performance score, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 133.3% lower power consumption.

The Iris Plus Graphics 950 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX Vega 11 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 11
Radeon RX Vega 11
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 950
Iris Plus Graphics 950

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 1820 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 11 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 12 votes

Rate Iris Plus Graphics 950 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.