GeForce4 4200 Go vs Radeon RX Vega 11

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking	573	not rated
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.76	no data
Architecture	Vega (2017−2021)	no data
GPU code name	Vega Raven Ridge	NV28M
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	26 October 2017 (6 years ago)	15 November 2002 (21 year ago)
Current price	$475	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	704	6
Core clock speed	no data	2 MHz
Boost clock speed	1240 MHz	200 MHz
Number of transistors	4,940 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	no data
Texture fill rate	61.60	no data
Floating-point performance	1,760 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon RX Vega 11 and GeForce4 4200 Go compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	no data	medium sized
Interface	IGP	no data
Width	IGP	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	System Shared	DDR
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	128 MB
Memory bus width	System Shared	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	System Shared	no data
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	DDR
Shader Model	6.4	no data
OpenGL	4.6	no data
OpenCL	2.0	no data
Vulkan	1.2.131	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Recency	26 October 2017	15 November 2002
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	128 MB
Chip lithography	14 nm	150 nm

---

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

---