GeForce GT 710 vs Radeon RX Vega 11

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX Vega 11 and GeForce GT 710, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX Vega 11
2018
35 Watt
5.49
+237%

RX Vega 11 outperforms GT 710 by a whopping 237% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking609958
Place by popularitynot in top-10072
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.04
Power efficiency10.805.91
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Kepler 2.0 (2013−2015)
GPU code nameRavenGK208
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date10 May 2018 (6 years ago)27 March 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$34.99

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores704192
Core clock speed300 MHz954 MHz
Boost clock speed1251 MHzno data
Number of transistors4,940 million915 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt19 Watt
Maximum GPU temperatureno data95 °C
Texture fill rate55.0415.26
Floating-point processing power1.761 TFLOPS0.3663 TFLOPS
ROPs88
TMUs4416

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCI Express 2.0
InterfaceIGPPCIe 2.0 x8
Lengthno data145 mm
Heightno data2.713" (6.9 cm)
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared2 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1.8 GB/s
Memory bandwidthno data14.4 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsMotherboard DependentDual Link DVI-DHDMIVGA
Multi monitor supportno data3 displays
HDMI-+
HDCP-+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
Audio input for HDMIno dataInternal

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Vision-+
PureVideo-+
PhysX-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.7 (6.4)5.1
OpenGL4.64.5
OpenCL2.11.2
Vulkan1.31.1.126
CUDA-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX Vega 11 5.49
+237%
GT 710 1.63

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX Vega 11 2109
+237%
GT 710 626

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RX Vega 11 3494
+269%
GT 710 947

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RX Vega 11 20848
+187%
GT 710 7270

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

RX Vega 11 157382
+123%
GT 710 70459

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD28
+250%
8
−250%
1440p5
+25%
4
−25%
4K12
+100%
6
−100%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data4.37
1440pno data8.75
4Kno data5.83

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+44.4%
9−10
−44.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+175%
4−5
−175%
Elden Ring 14−16
+600%
2−3
−600%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
+750%
2−3
−750%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+44.4%
9−10
−44.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+175%
4−5
−175%
Forza Horizon 4 20
+150%
8
−150%
Metro Exodus 18
+260%
5
−260%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+129%
7−8
−129%
Valorant 14−16
+275%
4−5
−275%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
+750%
2−3
−750%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+44.4%
9−10
−44.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+175%
4−5
−175%
Dota 2 27
+125%
12
−125%
Elden Ring 14−16
+600%
2−3
−600%
Far Cry 5 30
+100%
15
−100%
Fortnite 30−35
+300%
8−9
−300%
Forza Horizon 4 17
+240%
5
−240%
Grand Theft Auto V 17
+88.9%
9
−88.9%
Metro Exodus 11
+175%
4
−175%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 54
+218%
16−18
−218%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+129%
7−8
−129%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+125%
8−9
−125%
Valorant 14−16
+275%
4−5
−275%
World of Tanks 85−90
+167%
30−35
−167%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
+750%
2−3
−750%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+44.4%
9−10
−44.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+175%
4−5
−175%
Dota 2 42
+133%
18
−133%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+117%
12−14
−117%
Forza Horizon 4 15
+200%
5
−200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+171%
16−18
−171%
Valorant 14−16
+275%
4−5
−275%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Elden Ring 6−7 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+250%
10−11
−250%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
World of Tanks 40−45
+300%
10−11
−300%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+140%
5−6
−140%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+60%
5
−60%
Metro Exodus 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Valorant 14−16
+114%
7−8
−114%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 16−18
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%
Elden Ring 3−4 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+13.3%
14−16
−13.3%
Metro Exodus 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 15
+275%
4−5
−275%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+13.3%
14−16
−13.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Dota 2 17
+143%
7
−143%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Fortnite 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−25%
5
+25%
Valorant 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%

This is how RX Vega 11 and GT 710 compete in popular games:

  • RX Vega 11 is 250% faster in 1080p
  • RX Vega 11 is 25% faster in 1440p
  • RX Vega 11 is 100% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Battlefield 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RX Vega 11 is 750% faster.
  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GT 710 is 25% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX Vega 11 is ahead in 48 tests (96%)
  • GT 710 is ahead in 1 test (2%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.49 1.63
Recency 10 May 2018 27 March 2014
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 19 Watt

RX Vega 11 has a 236.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

GT 710, on the other hand, has 84.2% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX Vega 11 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 710 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 11
Radeon RX Vega 11
NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
GeForce GT 710

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 1816 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 11 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 4360 votes

Rate GeForce GT 710 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.