Radeon HD 6570 vs RX Vega 10

Place in performance ranking	640	946
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	2.28	0.07
Architecture	Vega (2017−2021)	TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code name	Vega Raven Ridge	Turks
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Design	no data	reference
Release date	26 October 2017 (6 years ago)	19 April 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$79
Current price	$449	$66 (0.8x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX Vega 10 has 3157% better value for money than HD 6570.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	640	480
Boost clock speed	1300 MHz	650 MHz
Number of transistors	4,940 million	716 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	40 Watt
Texture fill rate	52.00	15.60
Floating-point performance	no data	624.0 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon RX Vega 10 and Radeon HD 6570 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Bus support	no data	PCIe 2.1 x16
Interface	IGP	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	no data	168 mm
Width	no data	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	System Shared	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	4 GB
Memory bus width	System Shared	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	System Shared	900 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	28.8 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
Eyefinity	no data	1
HDMI	no data	+
DisplayPort support	no data	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration	no data	-
CrossFire	no data	1
Enduro	no data	-
HD3D	no data	-
PowerTune	no data	-
TrueAudio	no data	-
ZeroCore	no data	-
UVD	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	DirectX® 11
Shader Model	6.4	5.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.4
OpenCL	2.0	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	no data
Mantle	no data	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX Vega 10 4.24
+194%

HD 6570 1.44

RX Vega 10 outperforms HD 6570 by 194% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RX Vega 10 1639
+195%

HD 6570 556

RX Vega 10 outperforms HD 6570 by 195% in Passmark.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

RX Vega 10 2272
+167%

HD 6570 850

RX Vega 10 outperforms HD 6570 by 167% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

17
+240%

5−6

−240%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

+200%

4−5
−200%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9 +200%	3−4 −200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	12 +200%	4−5 −200%
Battlefield 5	19 +217%	6−7 −217%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 +200%	5−6 −200%
Cyberpunk 2077	9 +200%	3−4 −200%
Far Cry 5	12 +200%	4−5 −200%
Far Cry New Dawn	12 +200%	4−5 −200%
Forza Horizon 4	17 +240%	5−6 −240%
Hitman 3	16 +220%	5−6 −220%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8 +300%	2−3 −300%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14 +250%	4−5 −250%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10 +233%	3−4 −233%
Watch Dogs: Legion	14 +250%	4−5 −250%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	7 +250%	2−3 −250%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	8 +300%	2−3 −300%
Battlefield 5	16 +220%	5−6 −220%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 +200%	5−6 −200%
Cyberpunk 2077	5 +400%	1−2 −400%
Far Cry 5	11 +267%	3−4 −267%
Far Cry New Dawn	11 +267%	3−4 −267%
Forza Horizon 4	14 +250%	4−5 −250%
Hitman 3	7 +250%	2−3 −250%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 +300%	2−3 −300%
Metro Exodus	6 +200%	2−3 −200%
Red Dead Redemption 2	8−9 +300%	2−3 −300%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	5 +400%	1−2 −400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12 +200%	4−5 −200%
Watch Dogs: Legion	12 +200%	4−5 −200%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	7−8 +250%	2−3 −250%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Battlefield 5	17 +240%	5−6 −240%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 +250%	2−3 −250%
Far Cry 5	10 +233%	3−4 −233%
Far Cry New Dawn	8−9 +300%	2−3 −300%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 +225%	4−5 −225%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	8 +300%	2−3 −300%
Watch Dogs: Legion	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	7−8 +250%	2−3 −250%
Hitman 3	7−8 +250%	2−3 −250%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−11 +233%	3−4 −233%
Metro Exodus	2−3	0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3	0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	7−8 +250%	2−3 −250%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3	0−1
Far Cry 5	7−8 +250%	2−3 −250%
Far Cry New Dawn	2−3	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Hitman 3	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Horizon Zero Dawn	7−8 +250%	2−3 −250%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3	0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	1−2	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	0−1	0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3	0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	0−1
Far Cry 5	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Far Cry New Dawn	7−8 +250%	2−3 −250%
Forza Horizon 4	2−3	0−1

This is how RX Vega 10 and HD 6570 compete in popular games:

RX Vega 10 is 240% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	4.24	1.44
Recency	26 October 2017	19 April 2011
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	4 GB
Chip lithography	14 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	40 Watt