ATI Radeon HD 4670 vs RX Vega 10

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX Vega 10 with Radeon HD 4670, including specs and performance data.

RX Vega 10
2019
10 Watt
4.24
+328%

RX Vega 10 outperforms ATI HD 4670 by a whopping 328% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking6851112
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.01
Power efficiency29.251.16
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameRavenRV730
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date8 January 2019 (6 years ago)10 September 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$67

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640320
Core clock speed300 MHz750 MHz
Boost clock speed1301 MHzno data
Number of transistors4,940 million514 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt59 Watt
Texture fill rate52.0424.00
Floating-point processing power1.665 TFLOPS0.48 TFLOPS
ROPs88
TMUs4032

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data193 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared512 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data32 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model6.44.1
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL2.01.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX Vega 10 4.24
+328%
ATI HD 4670 0.99

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX Vega 10 1631
+330%
ATI HD 4670 379

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD17
+467%
3−4
−467%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data22.33

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9
+350%
2−3
−350%
Cyberpunk 2077 12
+500%
2−3
−500%
Elden Ring 11
+450%
2−3
−450%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 11
+450%
2−3
−450%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+500%
2−3
−500%
Cyberpunk 2077 7
+600%
1−2
−600%
Forza Horizon 4 17
+467%
3−4
−467%
Metro Exodus 12
+500%
2−3
−500%
Red Dead Redemption 2 19
+375%
4−5
−375%
Valorant 22
+340%
5−6
−340%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 16
+433%
3−4
−433%
Counter-Strike 2 7
+600%
1−2
−600%
Cyberpunk 2077 2 0−1
Dota 2 18
+350%
4−5
−350%
Elden Ring 7
+600%
1−2
−600%
Far Cry 5 17
+467%
3−4
−467%
Fortnite 15
+400%
3−4
−400%
Forza Horizon 4 14
+367%
3−4
−367%
Grand Theft Auto V 10
+400%
2−3
−400%
Metro Exodus 6
+500%
1−2
−500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 48
+380%
10−11
−380%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+367%
3−4
−367%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+367%
3−4
−367%
Valorant 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
World of Tanks 42
+367%
9−10
−367%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
+500%
2−3
−500%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+500%
2−3
−500%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
Dota 2 29
+383%
6−7
−383%
Far Cry 5 19
+375%
4−5
−375%
Forza Horizon 4 12
+500%
2−3
−500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+363%
8−9
−363%
Valorant 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 3−4 0−1
Elden Ring 4−5 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 3−4 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
+383%
6−7
−383%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4 0−1
World of Tanks 30−33
+329%
7−8
−329%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 0−1
Far Cry 5 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Metro Exodus 1−2 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Valorant 12−14
+500%
2−3
−500%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 16−18
+433%
3−4
−433%
Elden Ring 2−3 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+433%
3−4
−433%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+500%
2−3
−500%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+433%
3−4
−433%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Dota 2 16−18
+433%
3−4
−433%
Far Cry 5 4−5 0−1
Fortnite 3−4 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 2−3 0−1
Valorant 4−5 0−1

This is how RX Vega 10 and ATI HD 4670 compete in popular games:

  • RX Vega 10 is 467% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.24 0.99
Recency 8 January 2019 10 September 2008
Chip lithography 14 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 59 Watt

RX Vega 10 has a 328.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 292.9% more advanced lithography process, and 490% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX Vega 10 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 4670 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 10 is a notebook card while Radeon HD 4670 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 10
Radeon RX Vega 10
ATI Radeon HD 4670
Radeon HD 4670

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 1076 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 10 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 149 votes

Rate Radeon HD 4670 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.