FirePro W4300 vs Radeon RX Vega 10

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX Vega 10 with FirePro W4300, including specs and performance data.

RX Vega 10
2017
10 Watt
3.89

W4300 outperforms RX Vega 10 by an impressive 78% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking732579
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency29.6310.53
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameRavenBonaire
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date26 October 2017 (7 years ago)1 December 2015 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640768
Core clock speed300 MHz930 MHz
Boost clock speed1300 MHzno data
Number of transistors4,940 million2,080 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate52.0044.64
Floating-point processing power1.664 TFLOPS1.428 TFLOPS
ROPs816
TMUs4048

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data171 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data96 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x mini-DisplayPort

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_0)
Shader Model6.46.3
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RX Vega 10 3.89
FirePro W4300 6.91
+77.6%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX Vega 10 1630
FirePro W4300 2894
+77.5%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD17
−76.5%
30−35
+76.5%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 40
−75%
70−75
+75%
Cyberpunk 2077 12
−75%
21−24
+75%
Hogwarts Legacy 14
−71.4%
24−27
+71.4%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 19
−57.9%
30−33
+57.9%
Counter-Strike 2 33
−66.7%
55−60
+66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 9
−55.6%
14−16
+55.6%
Far Cry 5 12
−75%
21−24
+75%
Fortnite 33
−66.7%
55−60
+66.7%
Forza Horizon 4 17
−76.5%
30−33
+76.5%
Forza Horizon 5 13
−61.5%
21−24
+61.5%
Hogwarts Legacy 9
−55.6%
14−16
+55.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 15
−60%
24−27
+60%
Valorant 50−55
−75.9%
95−100
+75.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 16
−68.8%
27−30
+68.8%
Counter-Strike 2 9
−55.6%
14−16
+55.6%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 42
−66.7%
70−75
+66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 5
−60%
8−9
+60%
Dota 2 32
−71.9%
55−60
+71.9%
Far Cry 5 11
−63.6%
18−20
+63.6%
Fortnite 15
−60%
24−27
+60%
Forza Horizon 4 14
−71.4%
24−27
+71.4%
Forza Horizon 5 11
−63.6%
18−20
+63.6%
Grand Theft Auto V 10
−60%
16−18
+60%
Hogwarts Legacy 9−10
−55.6%
14−16
+55.6%
Metro Exodus 6
−66.7%
10−11
+66.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12
−75%
21−24
+75%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12
−75%
21−24
+75%
Valorant 50−55
−75.9%
95−100
+75.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 17
−76.5%
30−33
+76.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−75%
14−16
+75%
Dota 2 29
−72.4%
50−55
+72.4%
Far Cry 5 10
−60%
16−18
+60%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−57.9%
30−33
+57.9%
Hogwarts Legacy 9−10
−55.6%
14−16
+55.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
−68.8%
27−30
+68.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8
−75%
14−16
+75%
Valorant 50−55
−75.9%
95−100
+75.9%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 21−24
−73.9%
40−45
+73.9%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−75%
14−16
+75%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30−33
−66.7%
50−55
+66.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 4−5
−75%
7−8
+75%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−71.9%
55−60
+71.9%
Valorant 40−45
−70.7%
70−75
+70.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−71.4%
12−14
+71.4%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
−55.6%
14−16
+55.6%
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5
−75%
7−8
+75%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−60%
8−9
+60%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 8−9
−75%
14−16
+75%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−68.8%
27−30
+68.8%
Valorant 20−22
−75%
35−40
+75%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 12−14
−61.5%
21−24
+61.5%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−60%
8−9
+60%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
−75%
7−8
+75%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 4−5
−75%
7−8
+75%

This is how RX Vega 10 and FirePro W4300 compete in popular games:

  • FirePro W4300 is 76% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.89 6.91
Recency 26 October 2017 1 December 2015
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 50 Watt

RX Vega 10 has an age advantage of 1 year, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 400% lower power consumption.

FirePro W4300, on the other hand, has a 77.6% higher aggregate performance score.

The FirePro W4300 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX Vega 10 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 10 is a notebook graphics card while FirePro W4300 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 10
Radeon RX Vega 10
AMD FirePro W4300
FirePro W4300

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 1139 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 10 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 41 votes

Rate FirePro W4300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega 10 or FirePro W4300, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.