B200 SXM 192 GB vs Radeon RX Vega 10

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking745not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency29.88no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Blackwell (2024−2025)
GPU code nameRavenGB100
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date8 January 2019 (6 years ago)2024 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores64016896 ×2
Core clock speed300 MHz1665 MHz
Boost clock speed1301 MHz1837 MHz
Number of transistors4,940 million104,000 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt1000 Watt
Texture fill rate52.04969.9 ×2
Floating-point processing power1.665 TFLOPS62.08 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs824 ×2
TMUs40528 ×2
Tensor Coresno data528 ×2
L1 Cacheno data33 MB
L2 Cacheno data50 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 5.0 x16
Widthno dataSXM Module
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedHBM3e
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared96 GB ×2
Memory bus widthSystem Shared4096 Bit ×2
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data4.1 TB/s ×2
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)N/A
Shader Model6.4N/A
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA-10.0
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 1000 Watt

RX Vega 10 has 9900% lower power consumption.

B200 SXM 192 GB, on the other hand, has a 180% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 10 and B200 SXM 192 GB. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 10 is a notebook graphics card while B200 SXM 192 GB is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 10
Radeon RX Vega 10
NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB
B200 SXM 192 GB

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 1152 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 10 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 67 votes

Rate B200 SXM 192 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega 10 or B200 SXM 192 GB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.