ATI Radeon X1300 PRO AGP vs RX Vega 10

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking745not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency29.88no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)R500 (2005−2007)
GPU code nameRavenRV515
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date8 January 2019 (6 years ago)1 October 2005 (20 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640no data
Core clock speed300 MHz600 MHz
Boost clock speed1301 MHzno data
Number of transistors4,940 million107 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt31 Watt
Texture fill rate52.042.400
Floating-point processing power1.665 TFLOPSno data
ROPs84
TMUs404

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPAGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared256 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared400 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data12.8 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model6.43.0
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 8 January 2019 1 October 2005
Chip lithography 14 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 31 Watt

RX Vega 10 has an age advantage of 13 years, a 542.9% more advanced lithography process, and 210% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 10 and Radeon X1300 PRO AGP. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 10 is a notebook graphics card while Radeon X1300 PRO AGP is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 10
Radeon RX Vega 10
ATI Radeon X1300 PRO AGP
Radeon X1300 PRO AGP

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 1152 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 10 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 1 vote

Rate Radeon X1300 PRO AGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega 10 or Radeon X1300 PRO AGP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.