Arc Pro B390 vs Radeon RX 9070 XT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 9070 XT with Arc Pro B390, including specs and performance data.

RX 9070 XT
2025, $599
16 GB GDDR6, 304 Watt
65.01
+183%

9070 XT outperforms Pro B390 by a whopping 183% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking31276
Place by popularity67not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation63.46no data
Power efficiency16.4222.06
ArchitectureRDNA 4.0 (2025)Xe3-LPG (2026)
GPU code nameNavi 48Panther Lake
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date6 March 2025 (1 year ago)27 January 2026 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$599 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40961536
Core clock speed1660 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed2970 MHz2500 MHz
Number of transistors53,900 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology4 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)304 Watt80 Watt
Texture fill rate760.3120.0
Floating-point processing power48.66 TFLOPS7.68 TFLOPS
ROPs12824
TMUs25648
Tensor Cores128no data
Ray Tracing Cores6412
L0 Cache1 MBno data
L1 Cacheno data768 KB
L2 Cache8 MB16 MB
L3 Cache64 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 5.0 x16IGP
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount16 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed2518 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth644.6 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1aPortable Device Dependent
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.86.9
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.23.0
Vulkan1.41.4
DLSS+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RX 9070 XT 65.01
+183%
Arc Pro B390 22.98

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 9070 XT 26907
+183%
Samples: 14589
Arc Pro B390 9513
Samples: 5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD206
+194%
70−75
−194%
1440p116
+190%
40−45
−190%
4K73
+204%
24−27
−204%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.91no data
1440p5.16no data
4K8.21no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 300−350
+210%
100−105
−210%
Cyberpunk 2077 160−170
+196%
55−60
−196%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 190−200
+184%
70−75
−184%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 170−180
+192%
60−65
−192%
Counter-Strike 2 300−350
+210%
100−105
−210%
Cyberpunk 2077 160−170
+196%
55−60
−196%
Far Cry 5 296
+196%
100−105
−196%
Fortnite 300−350
+202%
100−105
−202%
Forza Horizon 4 250−260
+184%
90−95
−184%
Forza Horizon 5 190−200
+200%
65−70
−200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+190%
60−65
−190%
Valorant 350−400
+183%
130−140
−183%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 170−180
+192%
60−65
−192%
Counter-Strike 2 300−350
+210%
100−105
−210%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+193%
95−100
−193%
Cyberpunk 2077 160−170
+196%
55−60
−196%
Far Cry 5 285
+185%
100−105
−185%
Fortnite 300−350
+202%
100−105
−202%
Forza Horizon 4 250−260
+184%
90−95
−184%
Forza Horizon 5 190−200
+200%
65−70
−200%
Grand Theft Auto V 170−180
+183%
60−65
−183%
Metro Exodus 160−170
+202%
55−60
−202%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+190%
60−65
−190%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 497
+192%
170−180
−192%
Valorant 350−400
+183%
130−140
−183%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 170−180
+192%
60−65
−192%
Cyberpunk 2077 160−170
+196%
55−60
−196%
Far Cry 5 270
+184%
95−100
−184%
Forza Horizon 4 250−260
+184%
90−95
−184%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+190%
60−65
−190%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 257
+186%
90−95
−186%
Valorant 350−400
+183%
130−140
−183%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 300−350
+202%
100−105
−202%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 190−200
+184%
70−75
−184%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 500−550
+184%
180−190
−184%
Grand Theft Auto V 130−140
+209%
45−50
−209%
Metro Exodus 110−120
+214%
35−40
−214%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+192%
60−65
−192%
Valorant 450−500
+201%
150−160
−201%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 160−170
+198%
55−60
−198%
Cyberpunk 2077 90−95
+210%
30−33
−210%
Far Cry 5 260
+189%
90−95
−189%
Forza Horizon 4 220−230
+195%
75−80
−195%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 197
+203%
65−70
−203%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 150−160
+202%
50−55
−202%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 85−90
+193%
30−33
−193%
Grand Theft Auto V 150−160
+189%
55−60
−189%
Metro Exodus 70−75
+196%
24−27
−196%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 168
+205%
55−60
−205%
Valorant 300−350
+190%
110−120
−190%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 120−130
+200%
40−45
−200%
Counter-Strike 2 85−90
+193%
30−33
−193%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+221%
14−16
−221%
Far Cry 5 152
+204%
50−55
−204%
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
+187%
60−65
−187%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
+220%
30−33
−220%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 75−80
+193%
27−30
−193%

This is how RX 9070 XT and Arc Pro B390 compete in popular games:

  • RX 9070 XT is 194% faster in 1080p
  • RX 9070 XT is 190% faster in 1440p
  • RX 9070 XT is 204% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 65.01 22.98
Recency 6 March 2025 27 January 2026
Chip lithography 4 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 304 Watt 80 Watt

RX 9070 XT has a 183% higher aggregate performance score.

Arc Pro B390, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 months, a 33% more advanced lithography process, and 280% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 9070 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc Pro B390 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 9070 XT is a desktop graphics card while Arc Pro B390 is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 3840 votes

Rate Radeon RX 9070 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 1 vote

Rate Arc Pro B390 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 9070 XT or Arc Pro B390, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.