Radeon RX Vega M GL vs RX 9060
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon RX 9060 with Radeon RX Vega M GL, including specs and performance data.
RX 9060 outperforms RX Vega M GL by a whopping 425% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 72 | 493 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 28.03 | 10.84 |
| Architecture | RDNA 4.0 (2025) | GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) |
| GPU code name | Navi 44 | Polaris 22 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 5 August 2025 (less than a year ago) | 1 February 2018 (7 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 1792 | 1280 |
| Core clock speed | 1700 MHz | 931 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2990 MHz | 1011 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 29,700 million | 5,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 132 Watt | 65 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 334.9 | 80.88 |
| Floating-point processing power | 21.43 TFLOPS | 2.588 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 64 | 32 |
| TMUs | 112 | 80 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 28 | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 5.0 x16 | IGP |
| Width | 2-slot | no data |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 1024 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2518 MHz | 700 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 322.3 GB/s | 179.2 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
| Resizable BAR | + | - |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1b, 2x DisplayPort 2.1a | No outputs |
| HDMI | + | - |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.8 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.2.131 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Fortnite | 55−60
+0%
|
55−60
+0%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 30−35
+0%
|
30−35
+0%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 140−150
+0%
|
140−150
+0%
|
| Dota 2 | 65−70
+0%
|
65−70
+0%
|
| Fortnite | 55−60
+0%
|
55−60
+0%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 35−40
+0%
|
35−40
+0%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 30−35
+0%
|
30−35
+0%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 24−27
+0%
|
24−27
+0%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Dota 2 | 65−70
+0%
|
65−70
+0%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 30−35
+0%
|
30−35
+0%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 24−27
+0%
|
24−27
+0%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 55−60
+0%
|
55−60
+0%
|
4K
High Preset
| Grand Theft Auto V | 20−22
+0%
|
20−22
+0%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 10−11
+0%
|
10−11
+0%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Dota 2 | 30−35
+0%
|
30−35
+0%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 9−10
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
4K
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 9−10
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
All in all, in popular games:
- there's a draw in 17 tests (100%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 48.57 | 9.25 |
| Recency | 5 August 2025 | 1 February 2018 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 132 Watt | 65 Watt |
RX 9060 has a 425.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.
RX Vega M GL, on the other hand, has 103.1% lower power consumption.
The Radeon RX 9060 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX Vega M GL in performance tests.
Be aware that Radeon RX 9060 is a desktop graphics card while Radeon RX Vega M GL is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
