Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile vs Radeon RX 9060

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 9060 with Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

RX 9060
2025
8 GB GDDR6, 132 Watt
48.57
+55.5%

RX 9060 outperforms RTX 4000 Mobile by an impressive 55% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking72192
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency28.0321.64
ArchitectureRDNA 4.0 (2025)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameNavi 44TU104
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date5 August 2025 (recently)27 May 2019 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores17922560
Core clock speed1700 MHz1110 MHz
Boost clock speed2990 MHz1560 MHz
Number of transistors29,700 million13,600 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)132 Watt110 Watt
Texture fill rate334.9249.6
Floating-point processing power21.43 TFLOPS7.987 TFLOPS
ROPs6464
TMUs112160
Tensor Coresno data320
Ray Tracing Cores2840

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 5.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed2518 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth322.3 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1b, 2x DisplayPort 2.1aNo outputs
HDMI+-
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model6.86.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.21.2
Vulkan1.31.2.131
CUDA-7.5
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD160−170
+49.5%
107
−49.5%
1440p95−100
+50.8%
63
−50.8%
4K70−75
+48.9%
47
−48.9%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
God of War 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 101
+0%
101
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Far Cry 5 106
+0%
106
+0%
Fortnite 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%
God of War 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Valorant 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 87
+0%
87
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Dota 2 132
+0%
132
+0%
Far Cry 5 100
+0%
100
+0%
Fortnite 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%
God of War 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Metro Exodus 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 143
+0%
143
+0%
Valorant 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 81
+0%
81
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Dota 2 127
+0%
127
+0%
Far Cry 5 96
+0%
96
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
God of War 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 75
+0%
75
+0%
Valorant 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Metro Exodus 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 66
+0%
66
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Far Cry 5 69
+0%
69
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
God of War 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 51
+0%
51
+0%
Valorant 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 42
+0%
42
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Dota 2 106
+0%
106
+0%
Far Cry 5 36
+0%
36
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
God of War 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

This is how RX 9060 and RTX 4000 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RX 9060 is 50% faster in 1080p
  • RX 9060 is 51% faster in 1440p
  • RX 9060 is 49% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 65 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 48.57 31.24
Recency 5 August 2025 27 May 2019
Chip lithography 4 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 132 Watt 110 Watt

RX 9060 has a 55.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, and a 200% more advanced lithography process.

RTX 4000 Mobile, on the other hand, has 20% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 9060 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 9060 is a desktop graphics card while Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 9060
Radeon RX 9060
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Radeon RX 9060 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 40 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 9060 or Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.