RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell vs Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB with RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell, including specs and performance data.

RX 9060 XT 16GB
2025
16 GB GDDR6
58.48
+70.6%

RX 9060 XT 16GB outperforms RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell by an impressive 71% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking44162
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data37.31
ArchitectureRDNA 4 (2025)Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code nameno dataGB206
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date2 January 2025 (less than a year ago)11 August 2025 (recently)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20484352
Core clock speedno data790 MHz
Boost clock speed2530 MHz1950 MHz
Number of transistorsno data21,900 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data70 Watt
Texture fill rateno data265.2
Floating-point processing powerno data16.97 TFLOPS
ROPsno data64
TMUsno data136
Tensor Coresno data136
Ray Tracing Coresno data34

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 5.0 x8
Lengthno data167 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount16 GB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1125 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data288.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1b

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXno data12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.4
CUDA-12.0
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD171
+71%
100−110
−71%
1440p78
+73.3%
45−50
−73.3%
4K48
+77.8%
27−30
−77.8%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 290−300
+71.8%
170−180
−71.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 140−150
+71.8%
85−90
−71.8%
God of War 227
+74.6%
130−140
−74.6%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 160−170
+74.7%
95−100
−74.7%
Counter-Strike 2 290−300
+71.8%
170−180
−71.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 140−150
+71.8%
85−90
−71.8%
Far Cry 5 270
+80%
150−160
−80%
Fortnite 270−280
+72.5%
160−170
−72.5%
Forza Horizon 4 230−240
+76.9%
130−140
−76.9%
Forza Horizon 5 170−180
+78%
100−105
−78%
God of War 191
+73.6%
110−120
−73.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+75%
100−105
−75%
Valorant 300−350
+71.1%
190−200
−71.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 160−170
+74.7%
95−100
−74.7%
Counter-Strike 2 290−300
+71.8%
170−180
−71.8%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+73.8%
160−170
−73.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 140−150
+71.8%
85−90
−71.8%
Far Cry 5 248
+77.1%
140−150
−77.1%
Fortnite 270−280
+72.5%
160−170
−72.5%
Forza Horizon 4 230−240
+76.9%
130−140
−76.9%
Forza Horizon 5 170−180
+78%
100−105
−78%
God of War 149
+75.3%
85−90
−75.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 154
+71.1%
90−95
−71.1%
Metro Exodus 140−150
+75.3%
85−90
−75.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+75%
100−105
−75%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 273
+70.6%
160−170
−70.6%
Valorant 300−350
+71.1%
190−200
−71.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 160−170
+74.7%
95−100
−74.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 140−150
+71.8%
85−90
−71.8%
Far Cry 5 233
+79.2%
130−140
−79.2%
Forza Horizon 4 230−240
+76.9%
130−140
−76.9%
God of War 96
+74.5%
55−60
−74.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+75%
100−105
−75%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 146
+71.8%
85−90
−71.8%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 270−280
+72.5%
160−170
−72.5%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 170−180
+73%
100−105
−73%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 400−450
+76.8%
250−260
−76.8%
Grand Theft Auto V 83
+84.4%
45−50
−84.4%
Metro Exodus 95−100
+76.4%
55−60
−76.4%
Valorant 350−400
+73.6%
220−230
−73.6%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 140−150
+81.3%
80−85
−81.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+80%
45−50
−80%
Far Cry 5 160
+77.8%
90−95
−77.8%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
+75.5%
110−120
−75.5%
God of War 79
+75.6%
45−50
−75.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 102
+85.5%
55−60
−85.5%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 150−160
+77.6%
85−90
−77.6%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+73.3%
45−50
−73.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 91
+82%
50−55
−82%
Metro Exodus 60−65
+74.3%
35−40
−74.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 84
+86.7%
45−50
−86.7%
Valorant 300−350
+78.9%
180−190
−78.9%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+73.3%
60−65
−73.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+85.7%
21−24
−85.7%
Far Cry 5 80
+77.8%
45−50
−77.8%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+78.8%
80−85
−78.8%
God of War 53
+76.7%
30−33
−76.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
+74.5%
55−60
−74.5%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 75−80
+75.6%
45−50
−75.6%

This is how RX 9060 XT 16GB and RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell compete in popular games:

  • RX 9060 XT 16GB is 71% faster in 1080p
  • RX 9060 XT 16GB is 73% faster in 1440p
  • RX 9060 XT 16GB is 78% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 58.48 34.28
Recency 2 January 2025 11 August 2025
Chip lithography 4 nm 5 nm

RX 9060 XT 16GB has a 70.6% higher aggregate performance score, and a 25% more advanced lithography process.

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 months.

The Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB is our recommended choice as it beats the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB is a desktop graphics card while RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB
Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB
NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 110 votes

Rate Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB or RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.