GeForce FX 5700 vs Radeon RX 8060S

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 8060S with GeForce FX 5700, including specs and performance data.

RX 8060S
2025
40.46
+40360%

8060S outperforms FX 5700 by a whopping 40360% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1181521
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data0.31
ArchitectureRDNA 3.5 (2024−2025)Rankine (2003−2005)
GPU code nameno dataNV36
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date6 January 2025 (1 year ago)23 October 2003 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40no data
Core clock speedno data425 MHz
Boost clock speed2900 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data82 million
Manufacturing process technologyno data130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data25 Watt
Texture fill rateno data1.700
ROPsno data4
TMUsno data4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataAGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataDDR
Maximum RAM amountno data128 MB
Memory bus widthno data256 Bit
Memory clock speedno data250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data16 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXno data9.0a
OpenGLno data1.5 (2.1)
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD103-0−1
1440p51-0−1
4K35-0−1

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 220−230 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 95−100 0−1
Resident Evil 4 Remake 110−120 0−1

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 130−140 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 215 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 95−100 0−1
Far Cry 5 96 0−1
Fortnite 170−180 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 150−160 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 120−130 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160 0−1
Valorant 230−240 0−1

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 130−140 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 109 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 95−100 0−1
Far Cry 5 95 0−1
Fortnite 170−180 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 150−160 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 120−130 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 127 0−1
Metro Exodus 95−100 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 140−150 0−1
Valorant 230−240 0−1

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 130−140 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 95−100 0−1
Far Cry 5 92 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 150−160 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 101 0−1

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 170−180 0−1

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 71 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 280−290 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 70 0−1
Metro Exodus 60−65 0−1
Valorant 260−270 0−1

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 100−110 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50 0−1
Far Cry 5 100−105 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 110−120 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 75−80 0−1

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 100−110 0−1

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 36 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 76 0−1
Metro Exodus 35−40 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70 0−1
Valorant 240−250 0−1

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 65−70 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24 0−1
Far Cry 5 55−60 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 75−80 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60 0−1

4K
Epic

Fortnite 50−55 0−1

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 40.46 0.10
Recency 6 January 2025 23 October 2003

RX 8060S has a 40360% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 21 years.

The Radeon RX 8060S is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce FX 5700 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 8060S is a notebook graphics card while GeForce FX 5700 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 16 votes

Rate Radeon RX 8060S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 76 votes

Rate GeForce FX 5700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 8060S or GeForce FX 5700, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.