Radeon RX 7600M vs RX 7900 XT

Place in performance ranking	13	406
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	24.99	no data
Architecture	RDNA 3	RDNA 3
GPU code name	Navi 31 XT	Navi 33
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	3 November 2022 (1 year ago)	5 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$899	no data
Current price	$884 (1x MSRP)	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	5376	1792
Boost clock speed	2000 MHz	2070 MHz
Number of transistors	57,700 million	13,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	5 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	315 Watt	90 Watt (50 - 90 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate	804.4	246.4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon RX 7900 XT and Radeon RX 7600M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	no data	large
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	276 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	2x 8-pin	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	20 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	320 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	20000 MHz	16000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	800.0 GB/s	256.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x USB Type-C	Portable Device Dependent
HDMI	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.7	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.1	2.1
Vulkan	1.3	1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 7900 XT 74.37
+631%

RX 7600M 10.18

RX 7900 XT outperforms RX 7600M by 631% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RX 7900 XT 28779
+630%

RX 7600M 3940

RX 7900 XT outperforms RX 7600M by 630% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	212 +685%	27−30 −685%
1440p	145 +706%	18−20 −706%
4K	93 +675%	12−14 −675%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

237
+1381%

16−18

−1381%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	110−120 +438%	21−24 −438%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	130−140 +780%	14−16 −780%
Battlefield 5	160−170 +369%	35−40 −369%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	170−180 +556%	27−30 −556%
Cyberpunk 2077	212 +1225%	16−18 −1225%
Far Cry 5	196 +654%	24−27 −654%
Far Cry New Dawn	163 +504%	27−30 −504%
Forza Horizon 4	200−210 +481%	35−40 −481%
Hitman 3	210−220 +723%	24−27 −723%
Horizon Zero Dawn	160−170 +676%	21−24 −676%
Red Dead Redemption 2	120−130 +635%	16−18 −635%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	311 +1314%	21−24 −1314%
Watch Dogs: Legion	120−130 +583%	18−20 −583%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	110−120 +438%	21−24 −438%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	130−140 +780%	14−16 −780%
Battlefield 5	160−170 +369%	35−40 −369%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	170−180 +556%	27−30 −556%
Cyberpunk 2077	190 +1088%	16−18 −1088%
Far Cry 5	187 +619%	24−27 −619%
Far Cry New Dawn	157 +481%	27−30 −481%
Forza Horizon 4	200−210 +481%	35−40 −481%
Hitman 3	210−220 +723%	24−27 −723%
Horizon Zero Dawn	160−170 +676%	21−24 −676%
Metro Exodus	146 +873%	14−16 −873%
Red Dead Redemption 2	120−130 +635%	16−18 −635%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	295 +1241%	21−24 −1241%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	483 +2200%	21−24 −2200%
Watch Dogs: Legion	120−130 +583%	18−20 −583%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	110−120 +438%	21−24 −438%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	130−140 +780%	14−16 −780%
Battlefield 5	160−170 +369%	35−40 −369%
Cyberpunk 2077	179 +1019%	16−18 −1019%
Far Cry 5	173 +565%	24−27 −565%
Far Cry New Dawn	142 +426%	27−30 −426%
Forza Horizon 4	200−210 +481%	35−40 −481%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	265 +1162%	21−24 −1162%
Watch Dogs: Legion	120−130 +583%	18−20 −583%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	130−140 +807%	14−16 −807%
Hitman 3	160−170 +950%	16−18 −950%
Horizon Zero Dawn	120−130 +700%	16−18 −700%
Metro Exodus	135 +1588%	8−9 −1588%
Red Dead Redemption 2	70−75 +957%	7−8 −957%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	203 +1462%	12−14 −1462%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	80−85 +740%	10−11 −740%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	95−100 +1483%	6−7 −1483%
Battlefield 5	140−150 +729%	16−18 −729%
Cyberpunk 2077	122 +2340%	5−6 −2340%
Far Cry 5	173 +981%	16−18 −981%
Far Cry New Dawn	141 +729%	16−18 −729%
Forza Horizon 4	170−180 +889%	18−20 −889%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	140−150 +1478%	9−10 −1478%
Watch Dogs: Legion	80−85 +1540%	5−6 −1540%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	85−90 +1114%	7−8 −1114%
Hitman 3	95−100 +1000%	9−10 −1000%
Horizon Zero Dawn	85−90 +975%	8−9 −975%
Metro Exodus	87 +2075%	4−5 −2075%
Red Dead Redemption 2	45−50 +880%	5−6 −880%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	110 +2100%	5−6 −2100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	159 +1888%	8−9 −1888%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	60−65 +900%	6−7 −900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	60−65 +1400%	4−5 −1400%
Battlefield 5	95−100 +1138%	8−9 −1138%
Cyberpunk 2077	60 +5900%	1−2 −5900%
Far Cry 5	132 +1550%	8−9 −1550%
Far Cry New Dawn	129 +1073%	10−12 −1073%
Forza Horizon 4	130−140 +923%	12−14 −923%
Watch Dogs: Legion	45−50 +1500%	3−4 −1500%

This is how RX 7900 XT and RX 7600M compete in popular games:

RX 7900 XT is 685% faster in 1080p
RX 7900 XT is 706% faster in 1440p
RX 7900 XT is 675% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Cyberpunk 2077, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 7900 XT is 5900% faster than the RX 7600M.

All in all, in popular games:

Without exception, RX 7900 XT surpassed RX 7600M in all 68 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	74.37	10.18
Recency	3 November 2022	5 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount	20 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	5 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	315 Watt	90 Watt