Radeon RX 6500 vs RX 7900 XT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

RX 7900 XT
2022
20 GB GDDR6, 315 Watt
74.72
+279%

RX 7900 XT outperforms RX 6500 by a whopping 279% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking12265
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation25.37no data
ArchitectureRDNA 3no data
GPU code nameNavi 31 XTno data
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date3 November 2022 (1 year ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$899 no data
Current price$884 (1x MSRP)no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5376no data
Boost clock speed2000 MHzno data
Number of transistors57,700 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology5 nmno data
Power consumption (TDP)315 Wattno data
Texture fill rate804.4no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon RX 7900 XT and Radeon RX 6500 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16no data
Length276 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6no data
Maximum RAM amount20 GBno data
Memory bus width320 Bitno data
Memory clock speed20000 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth800.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x USB Type-Cno data
HDMI+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)no data
Shader Model6.7no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.1no data
Vulkan1.3no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 7900 XT 74.72
+279%
RX 6500 19.73

RX 7900 XT outperforms RX 6500 by 279% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RX 7900 XT 28859
+279%
RX 6500 7620

RX 7900 XT outperforms RX 6500 by 279% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD206
+312%
50−55
−312%
1440p138
+294%
35−40
−294%
4K92
+283%
24−27
−283%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 237
+295%
60−65
−295%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 110−120
+297%
30−33
−297%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 130−140
+340%
30−33
−340%
Battlefield 5 240−250
+302%
60−65
−302%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 120−130
+300%
30−33
−300%
Cyberpunk 2077 212
+285%
55−60
−285%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+293%
30−33
−293%
Far Cry New Dawn 180−190
+311%
45−50
−311%
Forza Horizon 4 230−240
+283%
60−65
−283%
Hitman 3 120−130
+310%
30−33
−310%
Horizon Zero Dawn 484
+303%
120−130
−303%
Metro Exodus 140−150
+317%
35−40
−317%
Red Dead Redemption 2 120−130
+313%
30−33
−313%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 580
+287%
150−160
−287%
Watch Dogs: Legion 130−140
+297%
35−40
−297%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 110−120
+297%
30−33
−297%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 130−140
+340%
30−33
−340%
Battlefield 5 240−250
+302%
60−65
−302%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 120−130
+300%
30−33
−300%
Cyberpunk 2077 190
+280%
50−55
−280%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+293%
30−33
−293%
Far Cry New Dawn 180−190
+311%
45−50
−311%
Forza Horizon 4 230−240
+283%
60−65
−283%
Hitman 3 120−130
+310%
30−33
−310%
Horizon Zero Dawn 300−350
+295%
80−85
−295%
Metro Exodus 79
+339%
18−20
−339%
Red Dead Redemption 2 120−130
+313%
30−33
−313%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 492
+310%
120−130
−310%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 483
+303%
120−130
−303%
Watch Dogs: Legion 130−140
+297%
35−40
−297%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 110−120
+297%
30−33
−297%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 130−140
+340%
30−33
−340%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 120−130
+300%
30−33
−300%
Cyberpunk 2077 179
+298%
45−50
−298%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+293%
30−33
−293%
Forza Horizon 4 230−240
+283%
60−65
−283%
Horizon Zero Dawn 350
+289%
90−95
−289%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 424
+285%
110−120
−285%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 265
+308%
65−70
−308%
Watch Dogs: Legion 130−140
+297%
35−40
−297%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 120−130
+313%
30−33
−313%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 160−170
+315%
40−45
−315%
Far Cry New Dawn 140−150
+311%
35−40
−311%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 85−90
+319%
21−24
−319%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 95−100
+296%
24−27
−296%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 110−120
+307%
27−30
−307%
Cyberpunk 2077 122
+307%
30−33
−307%
Far Cry 5 173
+284%
45−50
−284%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
+311%
45−50
−311%
Hitman 3 110−120
+307%
27−30
−307%
Horizon Zero Dawn 277
+296%
70−75
−296%
Metro Exodus 141
+303%
35−40
−303%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 325
+282%
85−90
−282%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 130−140
+297%
35−40
−297%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
+305%
21−24
−305%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 120−130
+300%
30−33
−300%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90
+319%
21−24
−319%
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70
+283%
18−20
−283%
Hitman 3 65−70
+319%
16−18
−319%
Horizon Zero Dawn 110−120
+293%
30−33
−293%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 110
+307%
27−30
−307%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 159
+298%
40−45
−298%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 60−65
+300%
16−18
−300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 60−65
+329%
14−16
−329%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+333%
12−14
−333%
Cyberpunk 2077 60
+329%
14−16
−329%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+317%
12−14
−317%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+291%
35−40
−291%
Horizon Zero Dawn 166
+315%
40−45
−315%
Metro Exodus 129
+330%
30−33
−330%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+317%
12−14
−317%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 80−85
+300%
21−24
−300%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+300%
16−18
−300%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
+342%
12−14
−342%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
+317%
6−7
−317%
Hitman 3 21−24
+283%
6−7
−283%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+300%
10−11
−300%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+300%
9−10
−300%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+300%
8−9
−300%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
+300%
10−11
−300%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+280%
10−11
−280%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
+290%
10−11
−290%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+280%
5−6
−280%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+325%
4−5
−325%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
+280%
5−6
−280%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
+400%
3−4
−400%

This is how RX 7900 XT and RX 6500 compete in popular games:

  • RX 7900 XT is 312% faster in 1080p
  • RX 7900 XT is 294% faster in 1440p
  • RX 7900 XT is 283% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 74.72 19.73

The Radeon RX 7900 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 6500 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 7900 XT is a desktop card while Radeon RX 6500 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT
Radeon RX 7900 XT
AMD Radeon RX 6500
Radeon RX 6500

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 1450 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7900 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 35 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.