FirePro V4900 vs Radeon RX 7800M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 7800M with FirePro V4900, including specs and performance data.

RX 7800M
2024
12 GB GDDR6, 180 Watt
38.16
+1483%

7800M outperforms V4900 by a whopping 1483% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking131880
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency16.312.47
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2025)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameNavi 32Turks
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date11 September 2024 (1 year ago)1 November 2011 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3840480
Core clock speed1295 MHz800 MHz
Boost clock speed2335 MHzno data
Number of transistors28,100 million716 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate560.419.20
Floating-point processing power35.87 TFLOPS0.768 TFLOPS
ROPs968
TMUs24024
Ray Tracing Cores60no data
L0 Cache960 KBno data
L1 Cache768 KB48 KB
L2 Cache4 MB256 KB
L3 Cache48 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data163 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount12 GB1 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed2250 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth432.0 GB/s64 GB/s
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model6.85.0
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL2.21.2
Vulkan1.3N/A

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RX 7800M 38.16
+1483%
FirePro V4900 2.41

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 7800M 15967
+1486%
Samples: 30
FirePro V4900 1007
Samples: 251

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 38.16 2.41
Recency 11 September 2024 1 November 2011
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 5 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 75 Watt

RX 7800M has a 1483.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.

FirePro V4900, on the other hand, has 140% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 7800M is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro V4900 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 7800M is a notebook graphics card while FirePro V4900 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 7800M
Radeon RX 7800M
AMD FirePro V4900
FirePro V4900

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 12 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7800M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 155 votes

Rate FirePro V4900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 7800M or FirePro V4900, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.