Arc A780 vs Radeon RX 7800 XT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking30not rated
Place by popularity40not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation68.04no data
Power efficiency16.45no data
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameNavi 32DG2-512
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date25 August 2023 (1 year ago)2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$499 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38404096
Core clock speed1295 MHz2200 MHz
Boost clock speed2430 MHz2200 MHz
Number of transistors28,100 million21,700 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)263 Watt200 Watt
Texture fill rate583.2563.2
Floating-point processing power37.32 TFLOPS18.02 TFLOPS
ROPs96128
TMUs240256
Tensor Coresno data512
Ray Tracing Cores6032

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pin2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount16 GB16 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed2438 MHz1093 MHz
Memory bandwidth624.1 GB/s559.6 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.11x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0
HDMI++

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.23.0
Vulkan1.31.3

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 5 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 263 Watt 200 Watt

RX 7800 XT has a 20% more advanced lithography process.

Arc A780, on the other hand, has 31.5% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 7800 XT and Arc A780. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT
Radeon RX 7800 XT
Intel Arc A780
Arc A780

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 2929 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7800 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 73 votes

Rate Arc A780 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.