Arc A750 vs Radeon RX 7800 XT

Place in the ranking	30	179
Place by popularity	60	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	67.95	57.44
Power efficiency	16.53	9.76
Architecture	RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)	Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code name	Navi 32	DG2-512
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	25 August 2023 (1 year ago)	12 October 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$499	$289

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 7800 XT has 18% better value for money than Arc A750.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	3840	3584
Core clock speed	1295 MHz	2050 MHz
Boost clock speed	2430 MHz	2400 MHz
Number of transistors	28,100 million	21,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	5 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	263 Watt	225 Watt
Texture fill rate	583.2	537.6
Floating-point processing power	37.32 TFLOPS	17.2 TFLOPS
ROPs	96	112
TMUs	240	224
Tensor Cores	no data	448
Ray Tracing Cores	60	28

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	267 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	2x 8-pin	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	2438 MHz	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	624.1 GB/s	512.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0
HDMI	+	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.7	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.2	3.0
Vulkan	1.3	1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 7800 XT 63.05
+98%

Arc A750 31.84

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 7800 XT 24233
+98%

Arc A750 12237

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RX 7800 XT 65611
+76%

Arc A750 37288

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RX 7800 XT 134322
+35.9%

Arc A750 98837

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RX 7800 XT 49707
+67.5%

Arc A750 29667

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RX 7800 XT 202773
+55.1%

Arc A750 130715

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

RX 7800 XT 745990
+17.6%

Arc A750 634482

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	215 +97.2%	109 −97.2%
1440p	122 +107%	59 −107%
4K	73 +103%	36 −103%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	2.32 +14.2%	2.65 −14.2%
1440p	4.09 +19.8%	4.90 −19.8%
4K	6.84 +17.4%	8.03 −17.4%

RX 7800 XT has 14% lower cost per frame in 1080p
RX 7800 XT has 20% lower cost per frame in 1440p
RX 7800 XT has 17% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	241 +165%	91 −165%
Cyberpunk 2077	258 +98.5%	130−140 −98.5%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 +27.2%	90−95 −27.2%
Counter-Strike 2	200 +127%	88 −127%
Cyberpunk 2077	96 +113%	45−50 −113%
Forza Horizon 4	488 +71.2%	285 −71.2%
Forza Horizon 5	160−170 +92.8%	80−85 −92.8%
Metro Exodus	171 +47.4%	116 −47.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2	110−120 +74.2%	65−70 −74.2%
Valorant	290−300 +133%	120−130 −133%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 +27.2%	90−95 −27.2%
Counter-Strike 2	163 +114%	76 −114%
Cyberpunk 2077	80 +100%	40−45 −100%
Dota 2	178 +79.8%	99 −79.8%
Far Cry 5	113 +66.2%	68 −66.2%
Fortnite	240−250 +65.8%	140−150 −65.8%
Forza Horizon 4	398 +66.5%	239 −66.5%
Forza Horizon 5	160−170 +92.8%	80−85 −92.8%
Grand Theft Auto V	178 +79.8%	99 −79.8%
Metro Exodus	147 +56.4%	94 −56.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	210−220 +18.1%	180−190 −18.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2	110−120 +74.2%	65−70 −74.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	170−180 +61.1%	100−110 −61.1%
Valorant	290−300 +133%	120−130 −133%
World of Tanks	270−280 +1.1%	270−280 −1.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 +27.2%	90−95 −27.2%
Counter-Strike 2	149 +98.7%	75 −98.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	74 +111%	35−40 −111%
Far Cry 5	120−130 +38.6%	85−90 −38.6%
Forza Horizon 4	340 +70.9%	199 −70.9%
Forza Horizon 5	160−170 +92.8%	80−85 −92.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	210−220 +18.1%	180−190 −18.1%
Valorant	290−300 +133%	120−130 −133%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	140 +241%	41 −241%
Grand Theft Auto V	140 +241%	41 −241%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 +0%	170−180 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	75−80 +153%	30−33 −153%
World of Tanks	400−450 +107%	200−210 −107%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	85−90 +40.3%	60−65 −40.3%
Counter-Strike 2	97 +79.6%	54 −79.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	48 +100%	24−27 −100%
Far Cry 5	160−170 +60%	100−105 −60%
Forza Horizon 4	243 +67.6%	145 −67.6%
Forza Horizon 5	110−120 +123%	50−55 −123%
Metro Exodus	148 +72.1%	86 −72.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	147 +158%	57 −158%
Valorant	250−260 +177%	90−95 −177%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	42 +110%	20 −110%
Dota 2	152 +238%	45 −238%
Grand Theft Auto V	152 +238%	45 −238%
Metro Exodus	63 +46.5%	43 −46.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	200−210 +109%	100−105 −109%
Red Dead Redemption 2	50−55 +150%	20−22 −150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	152 +238%	45 −238%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	80−85 +131%	35−40 −131%
Counter-Strike 2	75−80 +142%	30−35 −142%
Cyberpunk 2077	22 +120%	10−11 −120%
Far Cry 5	100−110 +139%	40−45 −139%
Fortnite	95−100 +129%	40−45 −129%
Forza Horizon 4	130 +54.8%	84 −54.8%
Forza Horizon 5	70−75 +154%	27−30 −154%
Valorant	140−150 +209%	45−50 −209%

This is how RX 7800 XT and Arc A750 compete in popular games:

RX 7800 XT is 97% faster in 1080p
RX 7800 XT is 107% faster in 1440p
RX 7800 XT is 103% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Dota 2, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the RX 7800 XT is 241% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

RX 7800 XT is ahead in 55 tests (98%)
there's a draw in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	63.05	31.84
Recency	25 August 2023	12 October 2022
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	5 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	263 Watt	225 Watt

RX 7800 XT has a 98% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 months, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 20% more advanced lithography process.

Arc A750, on the other hand, has 16.9% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 7800 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc A750 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.