Radeon RX 9070 GRE vs RX 7650 GRE

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 7650 GRE and Radeon RX 9070 GRE, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX 7650 GRE
2025, $279
8 GB GDDR6, 165 Watt
42.73
RX 9070 GRE
2025, $549
12 GB GDDR6, 220 Watt
58.04
+35.8%

9070 GRE outperforms 7650 GRE by a substantial 36% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking10246
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation91.4862.04
Power efficiency20.0320.26
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2026)RDNA 4.0 (2025)
GPU code nameNavi 33Navi 48
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release dateFebruary 2025 (1 year ago)8 May 2025 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$279 $549

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

RX 7650 GRE has 47% better value for money than RX 9070 GRE.

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20483072
Core clock speed1720 MHz1420 MHz
Boost clock speed2695 MHz2790 MHz
Number of transistors13,300 million53,900 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)165 Watt220 Watt
Texture fill rate345.0535.7
Floating-point processing power22.08 TFLOPS34.28 TFLOPS
ROPs6496
TMUs128192
Tensor Coresno data96
Ray Tracing Cores3248
L0 Cache512 KB768 KB
L1 Cache512 KBno data
L2 Cache2 MB8 MB
L3 Cache32 MB48 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 5.0 x16
Length204 mmno data
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pin2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB12 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed2250 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/s432.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.11x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1a
HDMI++

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.86.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.22.2
Vulkan1.31.4
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RX 7650 GRE 42.73
RX 9070 GRE 58.04
+35.8%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 7650 GRE 17686
Samples: 21
RX 9070 GRE 24025
+35.8%
Samples: 8

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD110−120
−45.5%
160
+45.5%
1440p60−65
−41.7%
85
+41.7%
4K40−45
−42.5%
57
+42.5%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.54
+35.3%
3.43
−35.3%
1440p4.65
+38.9%
6.46
−38.9%
4K6.98
+38.1%
9.63
−38.1%
  • RX 7650 GRE has 35% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • RX 7650 GRE has 39% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • RX 7650 GRE has 38% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 290−300
+0%
290−300
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 290−300
+0%
290−300
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Far Cry 5 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Fortnite 260−270
+0%
260−270
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 290−300
+0%
290−300
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Far Cry 5 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Fortnite 260−270
+0%
260−270
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Metro Exodus 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 364
+0%
364
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Far Cry 5 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 197
+0%
197
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 260−270
+0%
260−270
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 400−450
+0%
400−450
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Metro Exodus 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Valorant 350−400
+0%
350−400
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Far Cry 5 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 142
+0%
142
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Metro Exodus 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 113
+0%
113
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

This is how RX 7650 GRE and RX 9070 GRE compete in popular games:

  • RX 9070 GRE is 45% faster in 1080p
  • RX 9070 GRE is 42% faster in 1440p
  • RX 9070 GRE is 43% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 54 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 42.73 58.04
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 6 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 165 Watt 220 Watt

RX 7650 GRE has 33% lower power consumption.

RX 9070 GRE, on the other hand, has a 36% higher aggregate performance score, a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 50% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 9070 GRE is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 7650 GRE in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 118 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7650 GRE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 113 votes

Rate Radeon RX 9070 GRE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 7650 GRE or Radeon RX 9070 GRE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.