RTX A2000 Max-Q 8 GB vs Radeon RX 7650 GRE

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2025)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameNavi 33GA107
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release dateFebruary 2025 (recently)12 April 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$279 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20482560
Core clock speed1720 MHz607 MHz
Boost clock speed2695 MHz1177 MHz
Number of transistors13,300 million8,700 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)165 Watt95 Watt
Texture fill rate345.094.16
Floating-point processing power22.08 TFLOPS6.026 TFLOPS
ROPs6448
TMUs12880
Tensor Coresno data80
Ray Tracing Cores3220

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
Length204 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed2250 MHz1375 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/s176.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1Portable Device Dependent
HDMI+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.86.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.23.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 6 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 165 Watt 95 Watt

RX 7650 GRE has a 33.3% more advanced lithography process.

RTX A2000 Max-Q 8 GB, on the other hand, has 73.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 7650 GRE and RTX A2000 Max-Q 8 GB. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX 7650 GRE is a desktop card while RTX A2000 Max-Q 8 GB is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE
Radeon RX 7650 GRE
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q 8 GB
RTX A2000 Max-Q 8 GB

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 8 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7650 GRE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate RTX A2000 Max-Q 8 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 7650 GRE or RTX A2000 Max-Q 8 GB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.