Radeon RX 6800M vs 8050S

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon 8050S and Radeon RX 6800M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Radeon 8050S
2025
37.64
+18.8%

8050S outperforms RX 6800M by a moderate 19% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking131184
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data16.65
ArchitectureRDNA 3.5 (2024−2025)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameStrix PointNavi 22
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date2025 (recently)31 May 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20482560
Core clock speed1295 MHz2116 MHz
Boost clock speed2335 MHz2390 MHz
Number of transistors34,000 million17,200 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data145 Watt
Texture fill rate298.9382.4
Floating-point processing power9.564 TFLOPS12.24 TFLOPS
ROPs6464
TMUs128160
Ray Tracing Cores3240

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 5.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared12 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared192 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data384.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.86.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.12.1
Vulkan1.31.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Radeon 8050S 37.64
+18.8%
RX 6800M 31.69

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Radeon 8050S 15773
+18.8%
RX 6800M 13280

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Radeon 8050S 36323
RX 6800M 40391
+11.2%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Radeon 8050S 79256
+2.6%
RX 6800M 77244

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Radeon 8050S 23521
RX 6800M 34199
+45.4%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Radeon 8050S 130145
RX 6800M 160859
+23.6%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD108
+0.9%
107
−0.9%
1440p80−85
+12.7%
71
−12.7%
4K50−55
+16.3%
43
−16.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 85−90
−39.8%
123
+39.8%
Sons of the Forest 80−85
+37.3%
59
−37.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 130−140
−9.2%
143
+9.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 85−90
−25%
110
+25%
Far Cry 5 100
−6%
106
+6%
Fortnite 160−170
+13.8%
140−150
−13.8%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+17.6%
120−130
−17.6%
Forza Horizon 5 110−120
−10.1%
131
+10.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
+16.3%
120−130
−16.3%
Sons of the Forest 80−85
+42.1%
57
−42.1%
Valorant 220−230
+12.1%
190−200
−12.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 130−140
−7.6%
141
+7.6%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0.4%
270−280
−0.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 85−90
−15.9%
102
+15.9%
Far Cry 5 96
−6.3%
102
+6.3%
Fortnite 160−170
+13.8%
140−150
−13.8%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+17.6%
120−130
−17.6%
Forza Horizon 5 110−120
−5%
125
+5%
Grand Theft Auto V 118
+5.4%
112
−5.4%
Metro Exodus 90−95
−15.4%
105
+15.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
+16.3%
120−130
−16.3%
Sons of the Forest 80−85
+47.3%
55
−47.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 156
−20.5%
188
+20.5%
Valorant 220−230
+12.1%
190−200
−12.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 130−140
−6.1%
139
+6.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 85−90
−11.4%
98
+11.4%
Far Cry 5 85
−11.8%
95
+11.8%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+17.6%
120−130
−17.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
+16.3%
120−130
−16.3%
Sons of the Forest 80−85
+52.8%
53
−52.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 92
−18.5%
109
+18.5%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 160−170
+13.8%
140−150
−13.8%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 260−270
+18.3%
220−230
−18.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 75−80
−9.1%
84
+9.1%
Metro Exodus 55−60
−5.4%
59
+5.4%
Valorant 250−260
+8.5%
230−240
−8.5%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 95−100
−32.7%
130
+32.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
−15.9%
51
+15.9%
Far Cry 5 90−95
−8.7%
100
+8.7%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+24.1%
85−90
−24.1%
Sons of the Forest 55−60
+16%
50
−16%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 70−75
+26.3%
55−60
−26.3%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 100−105
+22%
80−85
−22%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 80−85
−4.9%
85
+4.9%
Metro Exodus 35−40
−8.6%
38
+8.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60−65
+0%
60
+0%
Valorant 230−240
+19%
190−200
−19%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
−36.7%
82
+36.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
−15%
23
+15%
Far Cry 5 50−55
−22%
61
+22%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+24.1%
55−60
−24.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
+30.8%
35−40
−30.8%
Sons of the Forest 30−35
−17.6%
40
+17.6%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 45−50
+25.6%
35−40
−25.6%

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Dota 2 126
+0%
126
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Dota 2 115
+0%
115
+0%
Valorant 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Dota 2 95
+0%
95
+0%

This is how Radeon 8050S and RX 6800M compete in popular games:

  • Radeon 8050S is 1% faster in 1080p
  • Radeon 8050S is 13% faster in 1440p
  • Radeon 8050S is 16% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Sons of the Forest, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Radeon 8050S is 53% faster.
  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the RX 6800M is 40% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Radeon 8050S is ahead in 27 tests (42%)
  • RX 6800M is ahead in 26 tests (40%)
  • there's a draw in 12 tests (18%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 37.64 31.69
Chip lithography 4 nm 7 nm

Radeon 8050S has a 18.8% higher aggregate performance score, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon 8050S is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 6800M in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 8050S
Radeon 8050S
AMD Radeon RX 6800M
Radeon RX 6800M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon 8050S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 334 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6800M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 8050S or Radeon RX 6800M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.