Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile vs Radeon RX 7600M XT

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 7600M XT with RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile, including specs and performance data.

RX 7600M XT
2023
8 GB GDDR6, 120 Watt
29.11
+23.8%

RX 7600M XT outperforms Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile by a significant 24% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking171219
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency19.2253.31
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2025)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameNavi 33AD107
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date4 January 2023 (2 years ago)26 February 2024 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20482048
Core clock speed1280 MHz1485 MHz
Boost clock speed2469 MHz2025 MHz
Number of transistors13,300 million18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate316.0129.6
Floating-point processing power20.23 TFLOPS8.294 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs12864
Tensor Coresno data64
Ray Tracing Cores3216

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargemedium sized
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed2250 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/s128.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.23.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RX 7600M XT 29.11
+23.8%
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile 23.52

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RX 7600M XT 38039
+87.9%
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile 20239

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RX 7600M XT 94691
+42.8%
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile 66297

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RX 7600M XT 28686
+103%
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile 14136

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

RX 7600M XT 9555
+81%
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile 5278

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD119
+25.3%
95−100
−25.3%
1440p60
+33.3%
45−50
−33.3%
4K33
+37.5%
24−27
−37.5%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 186
+24%
150−160
−24%
Counter-Strike 2 331
+27.3%
260−270
−27.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 116
+28.9%
90−95
−28.9%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 140
+27.3%
110−120
−27.3%
Battlefield 5 110−120
+28.9%
90−95
−28.9%
Counter-Strike 2 317
+26.8%
250−260
−26.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 96
+28%
75−80
−28%
Far Cry 5 127
+27%
100−105
−27%
Fortnite 140−150
+30%
110−120
−30%
Forza Horizon 4 245
+28.9%
190−200
−28.9%
Forza Horizon 5 192
+28%
150−160
−28%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+26%
100−105
−26%
Valorant 190−200
+30.7%
150−160
−30.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 85
+30.8%
65−70
−30.8%
Battlefield 5 110−120
+28.9%
90−95
−28.9%
Counter-Strike 2 164
+26.2%
130−140
−26.2%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+25%
220−230
−25%
Cyberpunk 2077 81
+24.6%
65−70
−24.6%
Dota 2 130−140
+36%
100−105
−36%
Far Cry 5 127
+27%
100−105
−27%
Fortnite 140−150
+30%
110−120
−30%
Forza Horizon 4 237
+24.7%
190−200
−24.7%
Forza Horizon 5 179
+27.9%
140−150
−27.9%
Grand Theft Auto V 133
+33%
100−105
−33%
Metro Exodus 98
+30.7%
75−80
−30.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+26%
100−105
−26%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 186
+24%
150−160
−24%
Valorant 190−200
+30.7%
150−160
−30.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+28.9%
90−95
−28.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 74
+34.5%
55−60
−34.5%
Dota 2 130−140
+36%
100−105
−36%
Far Cry 5 120
+26.3%
95−100
−26.3%
Forza Horizon 4 180
+28.6%
140−150
−28.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+26%
100−105
−26%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 105
+31.3%
80−85
−31.3%
Valorant 190−200
+30.7%
150−160
−30.7%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 140−150
+30%
110−120
−30%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 84
+29.2%
65−70
−29.2%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 210−220
+28.2%
170−180
−28.2%
Grand Theft Auto V 70
+27.3%
55−60
−27.3%
Metro Exodus 58
+28.9%
45−50
−28.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+25%
140−150
−25%
Valorant 230−240
+29.4%
180−190
−29.4%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 80−85
+29.2%
65−70
−29.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 48
+37.1%
35−40
−37.1%
Far Cry 5 102
+27.5%
80−85
−27.5%
Forza Horizon 4 142
+29.1%
110−120
−29.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 76
+26.7%
60−65
−26.7%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 80−85
+33.3%
60−65
−33.3%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 24−27
+38.9%
18−20
−38.9%
Counter-Strike 2 21
+31.3%
16−18
−31.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 74
+34.5%
55−60
−34.5%
Metro Exodus 35
+29.6%
27−30
−29.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 53
+32.5%
40−45
−32.5%
Valorant 190−200
+26.7%
150−160
−26.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+40%
35−40
−40%
Counter-Strike 2 25
+38.9%
18−20
−38.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 22
+37.5%
16−18
−37.5%
Dota 2 95−100
+28%
75−80
−28%
Far Cry 5 51
+27.5%
40−45
−27.5%
Forza Horizon 4 90
+28.6%
70−75
−28.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+26.7%
30−33
−26.7%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 35−40
+26.7%
30−33
−26.7%

This is how RX 7600M XT and Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RX 7600M XT is 25% faster in 1080p
  • RX 7600M XT is 33% faster in 1440p
  • RX 7600M XT is 38% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 29.11 23.52
Recency 4 January 2023 26 February 2024
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 6 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 35 Watt

RX 7600M XT has a 23.8% higher aggregate performance score, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 20% more advanced lithography process, and 242.9% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 7600M XT is our recommended choice as it beats the RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 7600M XT is a notebook graphics card while RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT
Radeon RX 7600M XT
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 500 Ada Generation

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 75 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7600M XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 20 votes

Rate RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 7600M XT or RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.