Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 vs Radeon RX 7600
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon RX 7600 with Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7, including specs and performance data.
RX 7600 outperforms Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 by a whopping 329% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 117 | 496 |
| Place by popularity | 52 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 86.48 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 18.32 | no data |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 (2022−2025) | Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) |
| GPU code name | Navi 33 | Tiger Lake Xe |
| Market segment | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 24 May 2023 (2 years ago) | 15 August 2020 (5 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $269 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2048 | 96 |
| Core clock speed | 1720 MHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 2655 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | 13,300 million | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 165 Watt | no data |
| Texture fill rate | 339.8 | no data |
| Floating-point processing power | 21.75 TFLOPS | no data |
| ROPs | 64 | no data |
| TMUs | 128 | no data |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 32 | no data |
| L0 Cache | 512 KB | no data |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB | no data |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | no data |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | no data |
| Length | 204 mm | no data |
| Width | 2-slot | no data |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR6 | DDR4 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | no data |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | no data |
| Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz | no data |
| Memory bandwidth | 288.0 GB/s | no data |
| Shared memory | - | + |
| Resizable BAR | + | - |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1 | no data |
| HDMI | + | - |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Quick Sync | no data | + |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | DirectX 12_1 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | no data |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | no data |
| OpenCL | 2.2 | no data |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | - |
Synthetic benchmarks
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 141
+370%
| 30−35
−370%
|
| 1440p | 71
+344%
| 16−18
−344%
|
| 4K | 37
+363%
| 8−9
−363%
|
Cost per frame, $
| 1080p | 1.91 | no data |
| 1440p | 3.79 | no data |
| 4K | 7.27 | no data |
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 348
+335%
|
80−85
−335%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 148
+393%
|
30−33
−393%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 161
+360%
|
35−40
−360%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 130−140
+229%
|
40−45
−229%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 336
+348%
|
75−80
−348%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 117
+333%
|
27−30
−333%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 183
+510%
|
30−33
−510%
|
| Fortnite | 170−180
+209%
|
55−60
−209%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 150−160
+276%
|
40−45
−276%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 120−130
+367%
|
27−30
−367%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 120
+344%
|
27−30
−344%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 150−160
+359%
|
30−35
−359%
|
| Valorant | 230−240
+154%
|
90−95
−154%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 130−140
+229%
|
40−45
−229%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 179
+348%
|
40−45
−348%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 270−280
+94.4%
|
140−150
−94.4%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 100
+376%
|
21−24
−376%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 174
+480%
|
30−33
−480%
|
| Fortnite | 170−180
+209%
|
55−60
−209%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 150−160
+276%
|
40−45
−276%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 120−130
+367%
|
27−30
−367%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 150
+329%
|
35−40
−329%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 94
+348%
|
21−24
−348%
|
| Metro Exodus | 113
+495%
|
18−20
−495%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 150−160
+359%
|
30−35
−359%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 210
+775%
|
24−27
−775%
|
| Valorant | 230−240
+154%
|
90−95
−154%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 130−140
+229%
|
40−45
−229%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 90
+400%
|
18−20
−400%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 163
+443%
|
30−33
−443%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 150−160
+276%
|
40−45
−276%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 71
+344%
|
16−18
−344%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 150−160
+359%
|
30−35
−359%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 123
+413%
|
24−27
−413%
|
| Valorant | 230−240
+362%
|
50−55
−362%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 170−180
+209%
|
55−60
−209%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 90
+400%
|
18−20
−400%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 280−290
+289%
|
70−75
−289%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 77
+492%
|
12−14
−492%
|
| Metro Exodus | 65
+550%
|
10−11
−550%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 170−180
+338%
|
40−45
−338%
|
| Valorant | 260−270
+152%
|
100−110
−152%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 100−110
+343%
|
21−24
−343%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 56
+367%
|
12−14
−367%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 115
+475%
|
20−22
−475%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 110−120
+423%
|
21−24
−423%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 50
+400%
|
10−11
−400%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 86
+378%
|
18−20
−378%
|
1440p
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 100−110
+435%
|
20−22
−435%
|
4K
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 22
+340%
|
5−6
−340%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 82
+310%
|
20−22
−310%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 24−27
+333%
|
6−7
−333%
|
| Metro Exodus | 38
+660%
|
5−6
−660%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 59
+490%
|
10−11
−490%
|
| Valorant | 240−250
+398%
|
45−50
−398%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 60−65
+482%
|
10−12
−482%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 45−50
+370%
|
10−11
−370%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 24
+380%
|
5−6
−380%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 57
+533%
|
9−10
−533%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 75−80
+381%
|
16−18
−381%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 22
+340%
|
5−6
−340%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 55−60
+511%
|
9−10
−511%
|
4K
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 50−55
+489%
|
9−10
−489%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Dota 2 | 65−70
+0%
|
65−70
+0%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Dota 2 | 65−70
+0%
|
65−70
+0%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Dota 2 | 30−35
+0%
|
30−35
+0%
|
This is how RX 7600 and Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 compete in popular games:
- RX 7600 is 370% faster in 1080p
- RX 7600 is 344% faster in 1440p
- RX 7600 is 363% faster in 4K
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RX 7600 is 775% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- RX 7600 performs better in 39 tests (93%)
- there's a draw in 3 tests (7%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 37.59 | 8.76 |
| Recency | 24 May 2023 | 15 August 2020 |
| Chip lithography | 6 nm | 10 nm |
RX 7600 has a 329.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 66.7% more advanced lithography process.
The Radeon RX 7600 is our recommended choice as it beats the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 in performance tests.
Be aware that Radeon RX 7600 is a desktop graphics card while Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
