Quadro K2000 vs Radeon RX 7600

Place in performance ranking	80	652
Place by popularity	66	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	38.34	0.32
Architecture	RDNA 3.0 (2022)	Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code name	Navi 33	GK107
Market segment	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	24 May 2023 (1 year ago)	1 March 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$269	$599
Current price	$352 (1.3x MSRP)	$550 (0.9x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 7600 has 11881% better value for money than Quadro K2000.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2048	384
Core clock speed	1720 MHz	954 MHz
Boost clock speed	2655 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	13,300 million	1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology	6 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	165 Watt	51 Watt
Texture fill rate	339.8	30.53
Floating-point performance	no data	732.7 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x8	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	204 mm	202 mm
Width	2-slot	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	2 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	18000 MHz	4000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	288.0 GB/s	64 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
HDMI	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	6.7	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.3	+
CUDA	no data	3.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 7600 42.19
+932%

Quadro K2000 4.09

Radeon RX 7600 outperforms Quadro K2000 by 932% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RX 7600 16294
+933%

Quadro K2000 1578

Radeon RX 7600 outperforms Quadro K2000 by 933% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	137 +1042%	12−14 −1042%
1440p	68 +1033%	6−7 −1033%
4K	38 +1167%	3−4 −1167%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

1500−1550
+914%

148

−914%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	750−800 +927%	70−75 −927%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	750−800 +927%	70−75 −927%
Battlefield 5	1350−1400 +900%	130−140 −900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	850−900 +900%	85−90 −900%
Cyberpunk 2077	1200−1250 +926%	117 −926%
Far Cry 5	900−950 +900%	90−95 −900%
Far Cry New Dawn	1050−1100 +910%	100−110 −910%
Forza Horizon 4	1600−1650 +926%	150−160 −926%
Hitman 3	850−900 +877%	85−90 −877%
Horizon Zero Dawn	3300−3350 +922%	323 −922%
Metro Exodus	1200−1250 +926%	110−120 −926%
Red Dead Redemption 2	1000−1050 +910%	95−100 −910%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	2900−2950 +921%	284 −921%
Watch Dogs: Legion	1000−1050 +890%	100−110 −890%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	750−800 +927%	70−75 −927%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	750−800 +927%	70−75 −927%
Battlefield 5	1350−1400 +900%	130−140 −900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	850−900 +900%	85−90 −900%
Cyberpunk 2077	1000−1050 +900%	100 −900%
Far Cry 5	900−950 +900%	90−95 −900%
Far Cry New Dawn	1050−1100 +910%	100−110 −910%
Forza Horizon 4	1600−1650 +926%	150−160 −926%
Hitman 3	850−900 +877%	85−90 −877%
Horizon Zero Dawn	1750−1800 +917%	170−180 −917%
Metro Exodus	750−800 +874%	77 −874%
Red Dead Redemption 2	1000−1050 +910%	95−100 −910%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	2350−2400 +922%	230 −922%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	2150−2200 +924%	210 −924%
Watch Dogs: Legion	1000−1050 +890%	100−110 −890%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	750−800 +927%	70−75 −927%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	750−800 +927%	70−75 −927%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	850−900 +900%	85−90 −900%
Cyberpunk 2077	900−950 +900%	90 −900%
Far Cry 5	900−950 +900%	90−95 −900%
Forza Horizon 4	1600−1650 +926%	150−160 −926%
Horizon Zero Dawn	1750−1800 +917%	172 −917%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	2050−2100 +930%	199 −930%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1250−1300 +916%	123 −916%
Watch Dogs: Legion	1000−1050 +890%	100−110 −890%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

1000−1050

+910%

95−100
−910%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	800−850 +876%	80−85 −876%
Far Cry New Dawn	1000−1050 +910%	95−100 −910%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	450−500 +878%	45−50 −878%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	450−500 +857%	45−50 −857%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	650−700 +900%	65−70 −900%
Cyberpunk 2077	550−600 +882%	56 −882%
Far Cry 5	1150−1200 +900%	115 −900%
Forza Horizon 4	900−950 +911%	85−90 −911%
Hitman 3	550−600 +882%	55−60 −882%
Horizon Zero Dawn	1300−1350 +924%	127 −924%
Metro Exodus	1200−1250 +917%	118 −917%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	1300−1350 +908%	129 −908%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	850−900 +888%	86 −888%
Watch Dogs: Legion	400−450 +926%	35−40 −926%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

750−800
+927%

70−75

−927%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	400−450 +830%	40−45 −830%
Far Cry New Dawn	350−400 +872%	35−40 −872%
Hitman 3	350−400 +900%	35−40 −900%
Horizon Zero Dawn	550−600 +900%	55−60 −900%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	400−450 +852%	42 −852%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	600−650 +917%	59 −917%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	290−300 +900%	27−30 −900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	270−280 +900%	27−30 −900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	280−290 +900%	27−30 −900%
Cyberpunk 2077	240−250 +900%	24 −900%
Far Cry 5	250−260 +900%	24−27 −900%
Forza Horizon 4	600−650 +917%	55−60 −917%
Horizon Zero Dawn	700−750 +872%	72 −872%
Metro Exodus	600−650 +868%	62 −868%
Watch Dogs: Legion	220−230 +900%	21−24 −900%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

350−400

+821%

35−40
−821%

This is how RX 7600 and Quadro K2000 compete in popular games:

RX 7600 is 1042% faster in 1080p
RX 7600 is 1033% faster in 1440p
RX 7600 is 1167% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	42.19	4.09
Recency	24 May 2023	1 March 2013
Cost	$269	$599
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	2 GB
Chip lithography	6 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	165 Watt	51 Watt