Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs Radeon RX 7600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 7600 with Iris Pro Graphics P580, including specs and performance data.

RX 7600
2023
8 GB GDDR6, 165 Watt
42.93
+719%

RX 7600 outperforms Iris Pro Graphics P580 by a whopping 719% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking88615
Place by popularity86not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation92.57no data
Power efficiency18.1424.35
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)Generation 9.0 (2015−2016)
GPU code nameNavi 33Skylake GT4e
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date24 May 2023 (1 year ago)1 September 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$269 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048576
Core clock speed1720 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speed2655 MHz1050 MHz
Number of transistors13,300 million189 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm14 nm+
Power consumption (TDP)165 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate339.875.60
Floating-point processing power21.75 TFLOPS1.21 TFLOPS
ROPs649
TMUs12872
Ray Tracing Cores32no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8Ring Bus
Length204 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4
Maximum RAM amount8 GB64 GB
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed2250 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1Portable Device Dependent
HDMI+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.76.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.23.0
Vulkan1.31.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 7600 42.93
+719%
Iris Pro Graphics P580 5.24

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 7600 16557
+720%
Iris Pro Graphics P580 2020

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD143
+794%
16−18
−794%
1440p68
+750%
8−9
−750%
4K37
+825%
4−5
−825%

Cost per frame, $

1080p1.88no data
1440p3.96no data
4K7.27no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 148
+1544%
9−10
−1544%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 90−95
+543%
14−16
−543%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 70−75
+1117%
6−7
−1117%
Battlefield 5 130−140
+871%
14−16
−871%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 85−90
+673%
10−12
−673%
Cyberpunk 2077 117
+1200%
9−10
−1200%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+718%
10−12
−718%
Far Cry New Dawn 100−110
+593%
14−16
−593%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
+503%
30−35
−503%
Hitman 3 90−95
+727%
10−12
−727%
Horizon Zero Dawn 170−180
+424%
30−35
−424%
Metro Exodus 130−140
+915%
12−14
−915%
Red Dead Redemption 2 95−100
+586%
14−16
−586%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 150−160
+732%
18−20
−732%
Watch Dogs: Legion 130−140
+183%
45−50
−183%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 90−95
+543%
14−16
−543%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 70−75
+1117%
6−7
−1117%
Battlefield 5 130−140
+871%
14−16
−871%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 85−90
+673%
10−12
−673%
Cyberpunk 2077 100
+1011%
9−10
−1011%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+718%
10−12
−718%
Far Cry New Dawn 100−110
+593%
14−16
−593%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
+503%
30−35
−503%
Hitman 3 90−95
+727%
10−12
−727%
Horizon Zero Dawn 170−180
+424%
30−35
−424%
Metro Exodus 130−140
+915%
12−14
−915%
Red Dead Redemption 2 95−100
+586%
14−16
−586%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 230
+1111%
18−20
−1111%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 85−90
+383%
18−20
−383%
Watch Dogs: Legion 130−140
+183%
45−50
−183%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 90−95
+543%
14−16
−543%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 70−75
+1117%
6−7
−1117%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 85−90
+673%
10−12
−673%
Cyberpunk 2077 90
+900%
9−10
−900%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+718%
10−12
−718%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
+503%
30−35
−503%
Hitman 3 90−95
+727%
10−12
−727%
Horizon Zero Dawn 172
+421%
30−35
−421%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 199
+947%
18−20
−947%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 123
+583%
18−20
−583%
Watch Dogs: Legion 130−140
+183%
45−50
−183%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 95−100
+586%
14−16
−586%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 80−85
+720%
10−11
−720%
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70
+713%
8−9
−713%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50
+820%
5−6
−820%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 45−50 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+900%
5−6
−900%
Cyberpunk 2077 56
+2700%
2−3
−2700%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+717%
6−7
−717%
Forza Horizon 4 230−240
+1692%
12−14
−1692%
Hitman 3 55−60
+522%
9−10
−522%
Horizon Zero Dawn 127
+958%
12−14
−958%
Metro Exodus 118
+3833%
3−4
−3833%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 129
+821%
14−16
−821%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 86
+2050%
4−5
−2050%
Watch Dogs: Legion 200−210
+509%
30−35
−509%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 70−75
+711%
9−10
−711%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+975%
4−5
−975%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
+1100%
3−4
−1100%
Hitman 3 35−40
+3400%
1−2
−3400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 190−200
+2011%
9−10
−2011%
Metro Exodus 55−60
+2650%
2−3
−2650%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 59
+5800%
1−2
−5800%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
+867%
3−4
−867%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
+1250%
2−3
−1250%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
+1300%
2−3
−1300%
Cyberpunk 2077 24 0−1
Far Cry 5 24−27
+733%
3−4
−733%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+1375%
4−5
−1375%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 69
+763%
8−9
−763%
Watch Dogs: Legion 21−24
+1000%
2−3
−1000%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
+533%
6−7
−533%

This is how RX 7600 and Iris Pro Graphics P580 compete in popular games:

  • RX 7600 is 794% faster in 1080p
  • RX 7600 is 750% faster in 1440p
  • RX 7600 is 825% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RX 7600 is 5800% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RX 7600 surpassed Iris Pro Graphics P580 in all 68 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 42.93 5.24
Recency 24 May 2023 1 September 2015
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 64 GB
Chip lithography 6 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 165 Watt 15 Watt

RX 7600 has a 719.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

Iris Pro Graphics P580, on the other hand, has a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 1000% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 7600 is our recommended choice as it beats the Iris Pro Graphics P580 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 7600 is a desktop card while Iris Pro Graphics P580 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 7600
Radeon RX 7600
Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580
Iris Pro Graphics P580

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 1816 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 4 votes

Rate Iris Pro Graphics P580 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.