GRID M60-4A vs Radeon RX 7600

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking111not rated
Place by popularity46not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation93.61no data
Power efficiency17.87no data
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2025)Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameNavi 33GM204
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date24 May 2023 (1 year ago)30 August 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$269 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20482048
Core clock speed1720 MHz557 MHz
Boost clock speed2655 MHz1178 MHz
Number of transistors13,300 million5,200 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)165 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate339.8150.8
Floating-point processing power21.75 TFLOPS4.825 TFLOPS
ROPs6464
TMUs128128
Ray Tracing Cores32no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Length204 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pin1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed2250 MHz1253 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/s160.4 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1No outputs
HDMI+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.76.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.21.2
Vulkan1.31.1.126
CUDA-5.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 24 May 2023 30 August 2015
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 6 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 165 Watt 225 Watt

RX 7600 has an age advantage of 7 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 366.7% more advanced lithography process, and 36.4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 7600 and GRID M60-4A. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX 7600 is a desktop card while GRID M60-4A is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 7600
Radeon RX 7600
NVIDIA GRID M60-4A
GRID M60-4A

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 2489 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate GRID M60-4A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 7600 or GRID M60-4A, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.