Arc Graphics 140V vs Radeon RX 7600 XT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 7600 XT with Arc Graphics 140V, including specs and performance data.

RX 7600 XT
2024
16 GB GDDR6, 190 Watt
38.85
+230%

7600 XT outperforms Graphics 140V by a whopping 230% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking106427
Place by popularity64not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation74.18no data
Power efficiency16.46no data
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2025)Xe² (2024)
GPU code nameNavi 33Lunar Lake iGPU
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date8 January 2024 (1 year ago)24 September 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$329 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20488
Core clock speed1980 MHzno data
Boost clock speed2755 MHz2050 MHz
Number of transistors13,300 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology6 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)190 Wattno data
Texture fill rate352.6no data
Floating-point processing power22.57 TFLOPSno data
ROPs64no data
TMUs128no data
Ray Tracing Cores32no data
L0 Cache512 KBno data
L1 Cache512 KBno data
L2 Cache2 MBno data
L3 Cache32 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8no data
Length204 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6LPDDR5x
Maximum RAM amount16 GB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed2250 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1no data
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12_2
Shader Model6.8no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.2no data
Vulkan1.3-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RX 7600 XT 38.85
+230%
Arc Graphics 140V 11.76

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 7600 XT 17178
+230%
Samples: 1442
Arc Graphics 140V 5198
Samples: 1650

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD130−140
+225%
40
−225%
1440p95−100
+228%
29
−228%
4K75−80
+213%
24
−213%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.53no data
1440p3.46no data
4K4.39no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 87
+0%
87
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 41
+0%
41
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 85
+0%
85
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Far Cry 5 52
+0%
52
+0%
Fortnite 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 70
+0%
70
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 35
+0%
35
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Valorant 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 42
+0%
42
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Far Cry 5 47
+0%
47
+0%
Fortnite 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 59
+0%
59
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 44
+0%
44
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 23
+0%
23
+0%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 62
+0%
62
+0%
Valorant 137
+0%
137
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Far Cry 5 44
+0%
44
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 19
+0%
19
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 28
+0%
28
+0%
Valorant 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 18
+0%
18
+0%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Valorant 114
+0%
114
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Far Cry 5 37
+0%
37
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Metro Exodus 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Valorant 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

This is how RX 7600 XT and Arc Graphics 140V compete in popular games:

  • RX 7600 XT is 225% faster in 1080p
  • RX 7600 XT is 228% faster in 1440p
  • RX 7600 XT is 213% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 63 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 38.85 11.76
Recency 8 January 2024 24 September 2024
Chip lithography 6 nm 3 nm

RX 7600 XT has a 230.4% higher aggregate performance score.

Arc Graphics 140V, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 months, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 7600 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc Graphics 140V in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 7600 XT is a desktop graphics card while Arc Graphics 140V is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT
Radeon RX 7600 XT
Intel Arc Graphics 140V
Arc Graphics 140V

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 1338 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7600 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 55 votes

Rate Arc Graphics 140V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 7600 XT or Arc Graphics 140V, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.