Radeon R4E Mobile Graphics vs RX 6900

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking35not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency19.26no data
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameNavi 21Beema
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date28 October 2020 (5 years ago)6 June 2014 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4608128
Core clock speedno data800 MHz
Boost clock speed2105 MHz600 MHz
Number of transistors23,000 million930 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)255 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate606.26.400
Floating-point processing power19.4 TFLOPS0.2048 TFLOPS
ROPs644
TMUs2888

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16IGP
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount16 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed16 GB/sSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth512.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-CPortable Device Dependent
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_0)
Shader Model6.56.5 (6.0)
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.1
Vulkan1.21.2.170

Pros & cons summary


Recency 28 October 2020 6 June 2014
Chip lithography 7 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 255 Watt 15 Watt

RX 6900 has an age advantage of 6 years, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

R4E Mobile Graphics, on the other hand, has 1600% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 6900 and Radeon R4E Mobile Graphics. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX 6900 is a desktop graphics card while Radeon R4E Mobile Graphics is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 6900
Radeon RX 6900
AMD Radeon R4E Mobile Graphics
Radeon R4E Mobile Graphics

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 90 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate Radeon R4E Mobile Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 6900 or Radeon R4E Mobile Graphics, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.