Radeon R4E Mobile Graphics vs RX 5950

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameNavi 21Beema
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release dateno data6 June 2014 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4864128
Core clock speedno data800 MHz
Boost clock speed1535 MHz600 MHz
Number of transistors21,000 million930 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)350 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate466.66.400
Floating-point processing power14.93 TFLOPS0.2048 TFLOPS
ROPs964
TMUs3048

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16IGP
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount24 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width384 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed14000 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth672.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.0 (12_1)12 (12_0)
Shader Modelno data6.5 (6.0)
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCLno data2.1
Vulkan-1.2.170

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 7 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 350 Watt 15 Watt

RX 5950 has a 300% more advanced lithography process.

R4E Mobile Graphics, on the other hand, has 2233.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 5950 and Radeon R4E Mobile Graphics. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX 5950 is a desktop graphics card while Radeon R4E Mobile Graphics is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 5950
Radeon RX 5950
AMD Radeon R4E Mobile Graphics
Radeon R4E Mobile Graphics

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 9 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5950 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate Radeon R4E Mobile Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 5950 or Radeon R4E Mobile Graphics, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.