Radeon AI PRO R9700 vs RX 6900

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking34not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency18.71no data
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)RDNA 4.0 (2025)
GPU code nameNavi 21Navi 48
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date28 October 2020 (4 years ago)July 2025

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores46084096
Core clock speedno data1660 MHz
Boost clock speed2105 MHz2920 MHz
Number of transistors23,000 million53,900 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)255 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate606.2747.5
Floating-point processing power19.4 TFLOPS47.84 TFLOPS
ROPs64128
TMUs288256
Tensor Coresno data128
Ray Tracing Coresno data64

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pin1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB32 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed16 GB/s2518 MHz
Memory bandwidth512.0 GB/s644.6 GB/s
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C4x DisplayPort 2.1a
HDMI+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.2
Vulkan1.21.3
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 32 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 255 Watt 300 Watt

RX 6900 has 17.6% lower power consumption.

AI PRO R9700, on the other hand, has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 6900 and Radeon AI PRO R9700. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX 6900 is a desktop card while Radeon AI PRO R9700 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 6900
Radeon RX 6900
AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700
Radeon AI PRO R9700

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 83 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon AI PRO R9700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 6900 or Radeon AI PRO R9700, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.