GeForce RTX 4090 Max-Q vs Radeon RX 6900

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking35not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency19.06no data
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameNavi 21AD103
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date28 October 2020 (4 years ago)3 January 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores46089728
Core clock speedno data930 MHz
Boost clock speed2105 MHz1455 MHz
Number of transistors23,000 million45,900 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)255 Watt80 Watt
Texture fill rate606.2442.3
Floating-point processing power19.4 TFLOPS28.31 TFLOPS
ROPs64112
TMUs288304
Tensor Coresno data304
Ray Tracing Coresno data76

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB16 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed16 GB/s1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth512.0 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-CPortable Device Dependent
HDMI+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.21.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 28 October 2020 3 January 2023
Chip lithography 7 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 255 Watt 80 Watt

RTX 4090 Max-Q has an age advantage of 2 years, a 75% more advanced lithography process, and 218.8% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 6900 and GeForce RTX 4090 Max-Q. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX 6900 is a desktop graphics card while GeForce RTX 4090 Max-Q is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 6900
Radeon RX 6900
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 4090 Max-Q

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 87 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 163 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4090 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 6900 or GeForce RTX 4090 Max-Q, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.