UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs vs Matrox Marvel G400-TV

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated725
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureG400 (1999−2002)Gen. 12 (2021−2023)
GPU code nameToucanTiger Lake Xe
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date20 May 1999 (26 years ago)30 March 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data32
Core clock speed125 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1450 MHz
Number of transistors10 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology250 nm14 nm
Texture fill rate0.25no data
ROPs2no data
TMUs2no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIno data
Length150 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSDRno data
Maximum RAM amount16 MBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed166 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth2.656 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGAno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX6.0DirectX 12_1
OpenGLNoneno data
OpenCLNoneno data
VulkanN/A-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 20 May 1999 30 March 2021
Chip lithography 250 nm 14 nm

UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs has an age advantage of 21 years, and a 1685.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Matrox Marvel G400-TV and UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Matrox Marvel G400-TV is a desktop graphics card while UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Matrox Marvel G400-TV
Marvel G400-TV
Intel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Matrox Marvel G400-TV on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 15 votes

Rate UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Matrox Marvel G400-TV or UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.